http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5706
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #2940 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <alex(a)thehandofagony.com> 2008-08-29 17:09:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15736)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=15736)
Console output from Wine 1.1.3
Still crashes in Wine 1.1.3
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326
--- Comment #18 from Tomáš Hnyk <tomashnyk(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-29 16:36:59 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > (In reply to comment #15)
> >
> > > > Well, if it has worked with the new version but not with the old one, it would
> > > > not have meant the bug had been fixed, right?
> > >
> > > Hard to say. The author could've changed the code around, making this issue
> > > moot.
> > Well, it was not my point. If the new version worked, it would be great, but it
> > would not fix the bug that the old version does not work with wine but with
> > Windows it does - and that is what the bug is about, is not it? I mean, even if
> > it were a bug in the original program - wine aims to be compatible bug for bug,
> > right?
> >
> > Anyway, it is fixed, so there is no need to dwell on it.
> >
>
> Right.
>
> AFAICT,
>
> New Wine + new version of Subtitle Workshop = Okay
> New Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop = Okay
> Old Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop = Broken
>
> Correct? If current Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop doesn't work
> correctly, then please reopen.
>
Correct.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836
--- Comment #12 from Dan Kegel <dank(a)kegel.com> 2008-08-29 16:12:10 ---
I will try to get a gprof-style report, sorry, I should have included
that in the first place.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8783
--- Comment #41 from Richard Gardiner <richard_gardiner(a)bluebottle.com> 2008-08-29 16:09:29 ---
\WINEDEBUG=+comm wine microbrn.exe &> file.op
wine --version
wine-1.1.3
The name of the application I am trying to run has changed - it is just a newer
version of the same thing.
The results are the same and since upgrading to a newer OS wine 0.9.22 no
longer compiles so I'm really stuck now being unable to run two versions in
parallel.
I've seen suggestions that the root cause might be due to a driver / module
problem and not directly related to wine - how is that possible when it works
with earlier versions?
Is there anything that can be done to resolve this or should the bug be
abandoned?
Rich
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326
--- Comment #17 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-29 14:49:14 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
>
> > > Well, if it has worked with the new version but not with the old one, it would
> > > not have meant the bug had been fixed, right?
> >
> > Hard to say. The author could've changed the code around, making this issue
> > moot.
> Well, it was not my point. If the new version worked, it would be great, but it
> would not fix the bug that the old version does not work with wine but with
> Windows it does - and that is what the bug is about, is not it? I mean, even if
> it were a bug in the original program - wine aims to be compatible bug for bug,
> right?
>
> Anyway, it is fixed, so there is no need to dwell on it.
>
Right.
AFAICT,
New Wine + new version of Subtitle Workshop = Okay
New Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop = Okay
Old Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop = Broken
Correct? If current Wine + old version of Subtitle Workshop doesn't work
correctly, then please reopen.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=836
--- Comment #11 from Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)orange.fr> 2008-08-29 14:43:29 ---
Hi Dan
do you have the callgraph info as well ?
I wonder where all these calls to module_get_container and module_find_by_addr
(the good news is that those two functions are rather easily optimisable in
term of speed, but I'm a bit surprised by the time spent in those)
I would have expected a bit more time spent at loading symbol information, and
those two functions are barely not called in there
TIA
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326
--- Comment #16 from Tomáš Hnyk <tomashnyk(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-29 14:29:54 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > Well, if it has worked with the new version but not with the old one, it would
> > not have meant the bug had been fixed, right?
>
> Hard to say. The author could've changed the code around, making this issue
> moot.
Well, it was not my point. If the new version worked, it would be great, but it
would not fix the bug that the old version does not work with wine but with
Windows it does - and that is what the bug is about, is not it? I mean, even if
it were a bug in the original program - wine aims to be compatible bug for bug,
right?
Anyway, it is fixed, so there is no need to dwell on it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3326
Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-29 14:03:55 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Well, if it has worked with the new version but not with the old one, it would
> not have meant the bug had been fixed, right?
Hard to say. The author could've changed the code around, making this issue
moot.
> But it actually works with the old version, so you can close this bug - sorry I
> did not test it by myself, but open source alternatives emerged in those three
> years and I do not do subtitling much anymore, so I did not have that much urge
> to.
>
Good to know, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.