wine-bugs June 2016

wine-bugs@winehq.org

1 participants
7719 discussions

[Bug 14350] New: SetClassLongW() to subclass window EDIT control Problem
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 18 May '21

18 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350 Summary: SetClassLongW() to subclass window EDIT control Problem Product: Wine Version: 1.0.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: user32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: hongbo(a)njstar.com CC: hongbo(a)njstar.com Created an attachment (id=14649) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14649) MSVC6 MFC test project with exe in debug dir Summary: SetClassLongW(hEditWnd, GCL_WNDPROC, (DWORD)EditWndProc) behave different on WINE 1.0 from Windows. Any EDIT window created after will be ANSI window on Windows, but Unicode Windows on Wine. How To Repeat: In the attached VC6 MFC ANSI App project, SetClassLongW is called in ------------------------------------------------------------------- static WNDPROC lpfnOldEditWndProc=NULL; LONG FAR PASCAL EditWndProc(HWND hWnd, WORD Message, WORD wParam, LONG lParam) { return CallWindowProcW((WNDPROC)lpfnOldEditWndProc, hWnd, Message, wParam,lParam); } int CDialogTestView::OnCreate(LPCREATESTRUCT lpCreateStruct) { if (CView::OnCreate(lpCreateStruct) == -1) return -1; HWND hEditWnd1 = CreateWindowEx(0,"EDIT", "E1",WS_POPUP,0, 0, 1, 1,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL); lpfnOldEditWndProc =(WNDPROC)SetClassLongW(hEditWnd1, GCL_WNDPROC, (DWORD)EditWndProc); // TODO: Add your specialized creation code here return 0; } ------------------------------------------------------------------- There is a EDIT control on the About dialogbox, when click 'OK' on window the program report the Edit Box is NOT unicode Window. But Under Wine 1.0, It says 'the Edit Box IS unicode Window'. To Test: run the EXE in debug folder, Help - About DialogTest - click 'OK'. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 18

[Bug 12891] New: ntdll: exception.ok test fails in PC-BSD but not Linux
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 18 May '21

18 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12891 Summary: ntdll: exception.ok test fails in PC-BSD but not Linux Product: Wine Version: 0.9.60 Platform: PC OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Keywords: testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=12597) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12597) +relay,+seh,+ntdll in git exception.c:602: Test failed: expected 4 exceptions, got 0 fixme:seh:fpe_handler untested SIMD exception: 0. Might not work correctly *** Error code 1 +relay,+seh,+ntdll log attached -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 10

[Bug 36282] New: valgrind shows an unitialized write in ieframe/tests/ie.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 May '21

16 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36282 Bug ID: 36282 Summary: valgrind shows an unitialized write in ieframe/tests/ie.c Product: Wine Version: 1.3.13 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ieframe Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==16468== Thread 6: ==16468== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s) ==16468== at 0x4EA8262B: ??? (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==16468== by 0x7BC46BB8: NtWriteFile (file.c:1073) ==16468== by 0x7B83E0AA: WriteFile (file.c:563) ==16468== by 0x5A01BB8: rpcrt4_conn_np_write (rpc_transport.c:444) ==16468== by 0x59F6B27: rpcrt4_conn_write (rpc_binding.h:189) ==16468== by 0x59F8AA9: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:849) ==16468== by 0x59F9BA0: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245) ==16468== by 0x59FCD02: process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:464) ==16468== by 0x59FCF82: RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:519) ==16468== by 0x59FD115: RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:541) ==16468== by 0x7BC909EA: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110) ==16468== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==16468== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==16468== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==16468== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==16468== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==16468== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so) ==16468== Address 0x47f9cf4 is 44 bytes inside a recently re-allocated block of size 92 alloc'd ==16468== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==16468== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==16468== by 0x59F88E9: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:808) ==16468== by 0x59F9BA0: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245) ==16468== by 0x59FCD02: process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:464) ==16468== by 0x59FCF82: RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:519) ==16468== by 0x59FD115: RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:541) ==16468== by 0x7BC909EA: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110) ==16468== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==16468== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630) ==16468== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571) ==16468== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428) ==16468== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so) ==16468== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so) ==16468== Uninitialised value was created by a client request ==16468== at 0x7BC4C52C: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209) ==16468== by 0x7BC4C697: initialize_block (heap.c:240) ==16468== by 0x7BC50FA3: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717) ==16468== by 0x501E635: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:186) ==16468== by 0x501EF50: CoTaskMemAlloc (objidl.h:1236) ==16468== by 0x505C935: RemUnknown_RemQueryInterface (stubmanager.c:690) ==16468== by 0x50661C6: IRemUnknown_RemQueryInterface_Stub (dcom_p.c:369) ==16468== by 0x59CA5BF: CStdStubBuffer_Invoke (cstub.c:477) ==16468== by 0x503D280: RPC_ExecuteCall (objidl.h:9086) ==16468== by 0x4FFC1ED: apartment_wndproc (compobj.c:1460) ==16468== by 0x548C509: ??? (winproc.c:173) ==16468== by 0x548C67E: call_window_proc (winproc.c:244) ==16468== by 0x548E817: WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:900) ==16468== by 0x544FBE4: DispatchMessageW (message.c:4019) ==16468== by 0x4793F60: IEWinMain (iexplore.c:1061) ==16468== by 0x472CA34: wWinMain (main.c:84) ==16468== by 0x472CD21: wmain (exe_wmain.c:51) ==16468== by 0x472CBFC: __wine_spec_exe_wentry (exe_wentry.c:36) ==16468== by 0x7B864247: ??? (process.c:1045) ==16468== by 0x7B864394: start_process (process.c:1097) ==16468== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 28831] New: secur32/tests/schannel.ok: occasional uninitialised memory read in _gnutls_recv_int() in test_communication()?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 16 May '21

16 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28831 Bug #: 28831 Summary: secur32/tests/schannel.ok: occasional uninitialised memory read in _gnutls_recv_int() in test_communication()? Product: Wine Version: 1.3.30 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: secur32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Classification: Unclassified I don't see this on every run, but sometimes Valgrind complains: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at _gnutls_recv_int (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14) by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14) by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14) by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14) by schan_InitializeSecurityContextW (schannel.c:728) by schan_InitializeSecurityContextA (schannel.c:775) by InitializeSecurityContextA (wrapper.c:282) by test_communication (schannel.c:644) by func_schannel (schannel.c:773) by run_test (test.h:556) by main (test.h:624) Uninitialised value was created by a client request by mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:208) by initialize_block (heap.c:239) by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1703) by init_buffers (schannel.c:496) by test_communication (schannel.c:633) by func_schannel (schannel.c:773) by run_test (test.h:556) by main (test.h:624) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 37849] New: Wine causing color temperature setting(redshift) not working for a short time
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 14 May '21

14 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37849 Bug ID: 37849 Summary: Wine causing color temperature setting(redshift) not working for a short time Product: Wine Version: 1.7.32 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: anonymous_temp_mail(a)yahoo.co.jp Distribution: --- [Bug] While using redshift(a display color temperature) and entered the sunset time, if then use wine to start a GUI program, the current display color temperature will be reset for several seconds and return back. [Reproducer] 1. Start redshift and ensure it entered sunset color. Better use -l LAT:LON to fake that you are in somewhere sun is already set. Default redshift will use randr backend to reset the color temp, so no extra setting is needed to reproduce. And default redshift will use 5500K for daytime and 3500K for nighttime, so the color temp change will be quite obvious. 2. Start wine GUI program I'm using Startcraft2 an galgame called "月に寄り添う乙女の作法2", both of them cause the display color temperature reset for several seconds. [Version] wine: 1.7.33 redshift: 1.9.1 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 14

[Bug 33031] New: Microsoft Windows Driver Development Kit (win7 ddk/wdk) fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 13 May '21

13 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33031 Bug #: 33031 Summary: Microsoft Windows Driver Development Kit (win7 ddk/wdk) fails Product: Wine Version: 1.3.28 Platform: x86 URL: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx? id=11800 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, Installer Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Prerequisite: winetricks mfc42 Mount the iso, run kitsetup.exe. I chose to install 'Build Environments' (a subset of 'Full Development Environment'). This fails: wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x84d5c3a5 at address 0x100228d (thread 0027), starting debugger... ... Backtrace: =>0 0x0100228d in eula (+0x228d) (0x0033f708) 1 0x0100236b in eula (+0x236a) (0x0033f790) 2 0x5f8019d1 in mfc42u (+0x19d0) (0x0033f7b0) 3 0x5f80195a in mfc42u (+0x1959) (0x0033f810) 4 0x5f8018e2 in mfc42u (+0x18e1) (0x0033f82c) 5 0x5f8018a1 in mfc42u (+0x18a0) (0x0033f858) the backtrace makes me suspect riched20, trying native gives: wine: Call from 0x7b83f2a9 to unimplemented function msls31.dll.LssbFDonePresSubline, aborting which may be a future problem, but belongs in a separate bug. austin@aw25 ~ $ sha1sum GRMWDK_EN_7600_1.ISO du -hde6abdb8eb4e08942add4aa270c763ed4e3d8242 GRMWDK_EN_7600_1.ISO austin@aw25 ~ $ du -h GRMWDK_EN_7600_1.ISO 620M GRMWDK_EN_7600_1.ISO austin@aw25 ~ $ wine --version wine-1.5.24-74-g5069ad7 luckily, I only wanted the headers, and running: $ msiexec /i wdk/headers.msi installs the headers fine. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 15956] New: "make test" doesn't always leave screen in same video mode as it started in
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 May '21

12 May '21

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15956 Summary: "make test" doesn't always leave screen in same video mode as it started in Product: Wine Version: 1.1.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: testcases AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com Some tests don't properly reset the video mode, even if they don't crash. I'm gathering a list of culprits and will post it here. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 4

[Bug 39522] New: Valgrind shows a leak in itemdlg tests
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 May '21

12 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39522 Bug ID: 39522 Summary: Valgrind shows a leak in itemdlg tests Product: Wine Version: 1.7.53 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: comdlg32 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: bunglehead(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Reported as: --- ==5188== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 296 of 1,248 ==5188== at 0x7BC50613: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==5188== by 0x7BC54E78: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1715) ==5188== by 0x587E780: add_item (itemdlg.c:793) ==5188== by 0x5889019: IFileDialogCustomize_fnAddControlItem (itemdlg.c:4079) ==5188== by 0x4AB42BD: IFileDialogCustomize_AddControlItem (shobjidl.h:16931) ==5188== by 0x4AB42BD: test_customize (???:0) ==5188== by 0x4ABC3A3: func_itemdlg (itemdlg.c:2434) ==5188== by 0x4ABF8E8: run_test (test.h:584) ==5188== by 0x4ABFD6C: main (test.h:666) ==5188== { <insert_a_suppression_name_here> Memcheck:Leak match-leak-kinds: definite fun:notify_alloc fun:RtlAllocateHeap fun:add_item fun:IFileDialogCustomize_fnAddControlItem fun:IFileDialogCustomize_AddControlItem fun:test_customize fun:func_itemdlg fun:run_test fun:main } --- Probably means custom control items are not released at all? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

[Bug 36413] New: valgrind shows uninitialized memory in msxml3/tests/xmparser.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 May '21

12 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36413 Bug ID: 36413 Summary: valgrind shows uninitialized memory in msxml3/tests/xmparser.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msxml3 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==24204== 28 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 219 of 700 ==24204== at 0x7BC50A9B: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:255) ==24204== by 0x538CBB8: apartment_getclassobject (compobj.c:526) ==24204== by 0x538FFC6: get_inproc_class_object (compobj.c:2894) ==24204== by 0x5392D2F: CoGetClassObject (compobj.c:3032) ==24204== by 0x53934B7: CoCreateInstance (compobj.c:3197) ==24204== by 0x4DD74AE: func_xmlparser (xmlparser.c:108) ==24204== by 0x4DD9310: run_test (test.h:584) ==24204== by 0x4DD96FF: main (test.h:654) ==24204== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 3

[Bug 36304] New: valgrind shows several leaks in msxml3/tests/xmldoc.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org 12 May '21

12 May '21

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36304 Bug ID: 36304 Summary: valgrind shows several leaks in msxml3/tests/xmldoc.c Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: msxml3 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com ==30829== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 693 ==30829== at 0x4006B11: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so) ==30829== by 0x6512C73: xmlStrndup (in /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.9.1) ==30829== by 0x6512D05: xmlStrdup (in /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.9.1) ==30829== by 0x64B59E4: xmlNewNode (in /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2.9.1) ==30829== by 0x61E6FBE: xmldoc_createElement (xmldoc.c:523) ==30829== by 0x4AAD9C3: test_xmlelem (msxml.h:10587) ==30829== by 0x4AAE5AB: func_xmldoc (xmldoc.c:1077) ==30829== by 0x4AB096C: run_test (test.h:584) ==30829== by 0x4AB0D5B: main (test.h:654) ==30829== ==30829== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 255 of 693 ==30829== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==30829== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==30829== by 0x4D080FA: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162) ==30829== by 0x4D08490: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324) ==30829== by 0x4D2B608: TLB_MultiByteToBSTR (typelib.c:1753) ==30829== by 0x4D300C8: ITypeLib2_Constructor_MSFT (typelib.c:3706) ==30829== by 0x4D2F3B8: TLB_ReadTypeLib (typelib.c:3460) ==30829== by 0x4D276DC: LoadTypeLibEx (typelib.c:478) ==30829== by 0x4D27618: LoadTypeLib (typelib.c:454) ==30829== by 0x4D2786A: LoadRegTypeLib (typelib.c:537) ==30829== by 0x6196581: get_typeinfo (dispex.c:161) ==30829== by 0x61E5F7D: xmldoc_GetTypeInfo (xmldoc.c:150) ==30829== by 0x4AA60A2: test_xmldoc (oaidl.h:811) ==30829== by 0x4AAE59C: func_xmldoc (xmldoc.c:1074) ==30829== by 0x4AB096C: run_test (test.h:584) ==30829== by 0x4AB0D5B: main (test.h:654) ==30829== ==5988== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 134 of 725 ==5988== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255) ==5988== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==5988== by 0x6431972: heap_alloc (msxml_private.h:169) ==5988== by 0x64330F0: XMLElement_create (xmlelem.c:505) ==5988== by 0x6433D2A: xmlelem_collection_IEnumVARIANT_Next (xmlelem.c:777) ==5988== by 0x4CA3931: test_xmlelem_collection (oaidl.h:992) ==5988== by 0x4CA65B0: func_xmldoc (xmldoc.c:1078) ==5988== by 0x4CA896C: run_test (test.h:584) ==5988== by 0x4CA8D5B: main (test.h:654) ==5988== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-bugs June 2016