https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43338
Bug ID: 43338
Summary: Jetopclient
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: wc006(a)163.com
CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 58675
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=58675
backtrace
i install Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 Service Pack 2\Microsoft .NET Framework
3.5 Service Pack 1\Microsoft Jet 4.0 Service Pack 8\Microsoft 数据访问核心组件 (MDAC)
2.8 SP1\Internet Explorer 8\JetopClientSetup.msi(download
http://lol.tepc.com.cn/JetopSummary/download/JetopClientSetup.msi) on windows 7
32bit bottle.When I login the software JetopClient open the website
(http://lol.tepc.com.cn/JetopSummary/download/JetopClientSetup.msi) than the
error has occur.
CrossOver Linux 16.0.6
Install location: /opt/cxoffice
64-bit OS
Desktop session: deepin
Window manager: Mutter(DeepinGala)
Locale: zh_CN.UTF-8
Contents of /etc/os-release:
PRETTY_NAME="Deepin 15"
NAME="Deepin"
VERSION_ID="15.4.1"
VERSION="15.4.1"
ID=deepin
HOME_URL="https://www.deepin.org/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="http://feedback.deepin.org/feedback/"
cxdiag output:
[MissingLibGphoto2Port]
"Level"="Suggest"
"Title"="Missing 32bit libgphoto2_port.so.10 library"
"Description"="Lets Windows applications access digital cameras."
[MissingLibOpencl]
"Level"="Suggest"
"Title"="Missing 32bit libOpenCL.so.1 library"
"Description"="Provides GPU computation support to Windows applications."
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23294
Summary: Eudora 7.1.0.9: The Icons of the minimized mailboxes
stack on top of each other
Product: Wine
Version: 1.2-rc3
Platform: x86-64
URL: http://www.eudora.com/download/eudora/windows/7.1/Eudo
ra_7.1.0.9.exe
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: alexandru.balut(a)gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=29033)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=29033)
Two minimized mailboxes create overlapping icons
- Open the "In" mailbox, minimize it, notice the icon appears in the
bottom-left corner;
- Open the "Out" mailbox, minimize it, notice the icon is over the icon of the
"In" mailbox (see attachment). It should be near it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657
shalinrox1232(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |shalinrox1232(a)gmail.com
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40198
Bug ID: 40198
Summary: Oblivion: corrupted screenshot using the stamp key
Product: Wine
Version: 1.9.3
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: directx-d3dx9
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: lorenzofer(a)live.it
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 53705
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=53705
screen1
Using wine 1.9.3 Staging.
Every time I take a screenshot in the game The Elder Scroll 4: Oblivion, the
screenshot is corrupted.
It's in greyscale, and misaligned
If I take a screenshot with the internal function of Oblivion Reloaded instead
it is all correct.
part of wine stderr.
fixme:d3d:wined3d_check_device_format_conversion wined3d 0x196e10, adapter_idx
0, device_type WINED3D_DEVICE_TYPE_HAL, src_format WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8X8_UNORM,
dst_format WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8X8_UNORM stub!
fixme:d3d:wined3d_check_device_format_conversion wined3d 0x196e10, adapter_idx
0, device_type WINED3D_DEVICE_TYPE_HAL, src_format WINED3DFMT_B5G6R5_UNORM,
dst_format WINED3DFMT_B8G8R8X8_UNORM stub!
fixme:d3dx:D3DXLoadSurfaceFromMemory Unhandled filter 0x80004.
fixme:d3dx:D3DXLoadSurfaceFromMemory Unhandled filter 0x5.
and others things
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4836
Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmitry(a)baikal.ru,
| |erich.e.hoover@wine-staging
| |.com, michael(a)fds-team.de
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42727
Bug ID: 42727
Summary: obsolete 128MB bitmap size limit
Product: Wine
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdi32
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: claude(a)mathr.co.uk
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 57708
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=57708
source code to probe supported bitmap size
The current WINE bitmap implementation has a size limit of 128MiB dating back
to 2008 with a comment about Windows XP:
https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/blob/39935fe5ad889d537d828cc82771bdb…
197 /* XP doesn't allow creating bitmaps larger than 128 MB */
198 if (bm.bmHeight > 128 * 1024 * 1024 / bm.bmWidthBytes)
199 {
200 SetLastError( ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY );
201 return 0;
202 }
However, recent versions of Windows seem to have a higher limit, of 2GiB.
Attached source code tries to create bitmaps with increasing sizes (each just
under 2^N bytes) and prints successes and eventual failure.
The bitmap test code seems to have a test for individual maximum dimension
(width), but not for maximum total bitmap size:
https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/blob/39935fe5ad889d537d828cc82771bdb…
Thanks for testing to users at
http://www.fractalforums.com/windows-fractal-software/windows-bitmap-size-t…
- I'll attach their results after submitting.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43181
Bug ID: 43181
Summary: NetBSD ptrace.c:678:46: error: 'struct dbreg' has no
member named 'dr0' (and more)
Product: Wine
Version: 2.9
Hardware: x86-64
OS: NetBSD
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: adrien_fernandes2(a)hotmail.com
Created attachment 58452
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=58452
Entire output
I'm using NetBSD 8.99.1 (GENERIC) amd64
I built successfully Wine for 64 bits ONLY (no 32 and 16 bits compatibility)
with the exact same wip/wine-staging package I made by myself.
To be able to build it to have 32 bits compatibility, I had to use a chroot
with a full set of NetBSD i386 inside. It was working in the past, a few months
earlier on an earlier version of Wine and NetBSD but not anymore now with 2.9
and NetBSD 8.99.1 (if it can be the problem)
I attached the entire output when I "make -C /usr/pkgsrc/wip/wine-staging"
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43313
Bug ID: 43313
Summary: valgrind shows several uninitialized writes in
dlls/dinput/tests/device.c
Product: Wine
Version: 2.12
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: directx-dinput
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
CC: 00cpxxx(a)gmail.com
Distribution: Gentoo
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A6DAE: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:718)
==21119== by 0x52A6F15: JoystickAImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:736)
==21119== by 0x48783BA: test_object_info (device.c:118)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Acquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6B64: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A700D: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:762)
==21119== by 0x52A70F0: JoystickAImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:774)
==21119== by 0x4878441: test_object_info (device.c:121)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Unacquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6F36: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A6DAE: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:718)
==21119== by 0x52A6F15: JoystickAImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:736)
==21119== by 0x48785AF: test_object_info (device.c:131)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Acquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6B64: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A700D: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:762)
==21119== by 0x52A70F0: JoystickAImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:774)
==21119== by 0x4878683: test_object_info (device.c:136)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Unacquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6F36: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A6DAE: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:718)
==21119== by 0x52A6F15: JoystickAImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:736)
==21119== by 0x48788F9: test_object_info (device.c:161)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Acquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6B64: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A700D: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:762)
==21119== by 0x52A70F0: JoystickAImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:774)
==21119== by 0x48789BD: test_object_info (device.c:166)
==21119== by 0x4878BBB: enum_devices (device.c:194)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f68c is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Unacquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6F36: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A6DAE: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:718)
==21119== by 0x48783BA: test_object_info (device.c:118)
==21119== by 0x4878C4C: enum_devices (device.c:200)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f6cc is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Acquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6B64: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A700D: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:762)
==21119== by 0x4878441: test_object_info (device.c:121)
==21119== by 0x4878C4C: enum_devices (device.c:200)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f6cc is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Unacquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6F36: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A6DAE: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:718)
==21119== by 0x48785AF: test_object_info (device.c:131)
==21119== by 0x4878C4C: enum_devices (device.c:200)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f6cc is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Acquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6B64: JoystickWImpl_Acquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:684)
==21119==
==21119== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==21119== at 0x424DE7F: ??? (syscall-template.S:84)
==21119== by 0x52A700D: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:762)
==21119== by 0x4878683: test_object_info (device.c:136)
==21119== by 0x4878C4C: enum_devices (device.c:200)
==21119== by 0x5295DD3: ??? (dinput_main.c:351)
==21119== by 0x5296011: IDirectInputAImpl_EnumDevices (dinput_main.c:419)
==21119== by 0x4878EF8: device_tests (device.c:241)
==21119== by 0x4879050: func_device (device.c:266)
==21119== by 0x48822E7: run_test (test.h:603)
==21119== by 0x4882739: main (test.h:687)
==21119== Address 0x4b0f6cc is on thread 1's stack
==21119== in frame #1, created by JoystickWImpl_Unacquire
(joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation
==21119== at 0x52A6F36: JoystickWImpl_Unacquire (joystick_linuxinput.c:743)
==21119==
wine-2.12.
Note: I had a Sony DS4 plugged in via USB when the tests were run, which may be
related
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36183
Bug ID: 36183
Summary: valgrind shows a potential leaks in atl100/tests/atl.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.13
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: atl
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==13578== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 37 of 602
==13578== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==13578== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==13578== by 0x7B8457FF: HeapAlloc (heap.c:271)
==13578== by 0x7B845AD4: GlobalAlloc (heap.c:376)
==13578== by 0x4E29357: OLEClipbrd_Initialize (clipboard.c:1732)
==13578== by 0x4E626C6: OleInitialize (ole2.c:215)
==13578== by 0x4DE5CA0: AtlAxWinInit (atl_ax.c:108)
==13578== by 0x4C9708E: test_ax_win (atl.c:600)
==13578== by 0x4C97273: func_atl (atl.c:627)
==13578== by 0x4C98072: run_test (test.h:584)
==13578== by 0x4C98460: main (test.h:654)
==13578==
==13578== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 208 of 602
==13578== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==13578== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==13578== by 0x7BC39A6B: RtlInitializeCriticalSectionEx (critsection.c:326)
==13578== by 0x7B876AE5: InitializeCriticalSectionEx (sync.c:356)
==13578== by 0x7B876A64: InitializeCriticalSection (sync.c:313)
==13578== by 0x4DE4213: AtlWinModuleInit (atl.c:436)
==13578== by 0x4C950D9: test_winmodule (atl.c:89)
==13578== by 0x4C9725A: func_atl (atl.c:622)
==13578== by 0x4C98072: run_test (test.h:584)
==13578== by 0x4C98460: main (test.h:654)
==13578==
==1611== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 217 of 629
==1611== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==1611== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==1611== by 0x7BC39A6B: RtlInitializeCriticalSectionEx (critsection.c:326)
==1611== by 0x7B876AE5: InitializeCriticalSectionEx (sync.c:356)
==1611== by 0x7B876A64: InitializeCriticalSection (sync.c:313)
==1611== by 0x4E62252: test_winmodule (atl.c:101)
==1611== by 0x4E6425A: func_atl (atl.c:622)
==1611== by 0x4E65072: run_test (test.h:584)
==1611== by 0x4E65460: main (test.h:654)
==1611==
==1611== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 218 of 629
==1611== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==1611== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==1611== by 0x5B300B4: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162)
==1611== by 0x5B3044A: SysAllocStringLen (oleaut.c:324)
==1611== by 0x5B535E8: TLB_MultiByteToBSTR (typelib.c:1753)
==1611== by 0x5B580A8: ITypeLib2_Constructor_MSFT (typelib.c:3706)
==1611== by 0x5B57398: TLB_ReadTypeLib (typelib.c:3460)
==1611== by 0x5B4F6BC: LoadTypeLibEx (typelib.c:478)
==1611== by 0x5B4F5F8: LoadTypeLib (typelib.c:454)
==1611== by 0x4E639C1: Dispatch_GetTypeInfo (atl.c:520)
==1611== by 0x4F853FA: AtlGetObjectSourceInterface (oaidl.h:811)
==1611== by 0x4E63D58: test_source_iface (atl.c:576)
==1611== by 0x4E6426E: func_atl (atl.c:626)
==1611== by 0x4E65072: run_test (test.h:584)
==1611== by 0x4E65460: main (test.h:654)
==1611==
==1659== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 218 of 630
==1659== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==1659== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==1659== by 0x7BC39A6B: RtlInitializeCriticalSectionEx (critsection.c:326)
==1659== by 0x7B876AE5: InitializeCriticalSectionEx (sync.c:356)
==1659== by 0x7B876A64: InitializeCriticalSection (sync.c:313)
==1659== by 0x4E62252: test_winmodule (atl.c:101)
==1659== by 0x4E6425A: func_atl (atl.c:622)
==1659== by 0x4E65072: run_test (test.h:584)
==1659== by 0x4E65460: main (test.h:654)
==1659==
==1986== 80 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 348 of 630
==1986== at 0x7BC4C6B7: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==1986== by 0x7BC50EFB: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==1986== by 0x5B040B4: alloc_bstr (oleaut.c:162)
==1986== by 0x5B045F5: SysAllocStringByteLen (oleaut.c:413)
==1986== by 0x5B29DA8: MSFT_ReadAllStrings (typelib.c:2879)
==1986== by 0x5B2B9F0: ITypeLib2_Constructor_MSFT (typelib.c:3581)
==1986== by 0x5B2B398: TLB_ReadTypeLib (typelib.c:3460)
==1986== by 0x5B236BC: LoadTypeLibEx (typelib.c:478)
==1986== by 0x5B235F8: LoadTypeLib (typelib.c:454)
==1986== by 0x4A349C1: Dispatch_GetTypeInfo (atl.c:520)
==1986== by 0x4F553FA: AtlGetObjectSourceInterface (oaidl.h:811)
==1986== by 0x4A34D58: test_source_iface (atl.c:576)
==1986== by 0x4A3526E: func_atl (atl.c:626)
==1986== by 0x4A36072: run_test (test.h:584)
==1986== by 0x4A36460: main (test.h:654)
==1986==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.