http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15462
Summary: Wine blocking on exit when stdout and stderr are piped
Product: Wine
Version: 1.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: chris(a)neko.net.nz
Created an attachment (id=16357)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16357)
Output of two simultaneous runs of described script
The issue occurs when concurrently running shell scripts which call Wine
processes whose standard out and standard error are both piped to another
program.
When two instances of a script such as the following are run concurrently, the
first child wine processes started by each of then run together, but in one of
the scripts that child doesn't fully exit until the _other_ script has
completely run and exited. (The Wine process terminates, but the pipeline
doesn't complete and so the script doesn't continue.)
A bash test-case to show this behaviour is as follows:
for iter in first second ; do echo "[$$] running $iter child wine" `date`; wine
sleep-long.exe 2>&1 | tee /dev/null; done; echo "[$$] done " `date`
The problem doesn't occur if either the redirection or pipe is removed, if I
run the scripts in separate Wine environments using $WINEPREFIX, or if I have
another long-lived Wine process which stays running throughout the entire
operation.
An example run with timing is attached.
The test Wine program used above, 'sleep-long', is the following tiny C program
(tested with Microsoft cl and Cygwin GCC with mingw):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
int main(){
printf("Started fake compiler, sleeping 8000ms\n");
Sleep(8000);
printf("Exiting fake compiler\n");
exit(0);
}
I've been able to reproduce this problem on several systems and Wine versions
(Debian Lenny with distro-packaged Wine 1.0.0-1, Debian Etch with Wine
1.0-rc1-1~bpo40+1 from Debian backports, Ubuntu Dapper with distro-packaged
Wine 0.9.9-0ubuntu2) but not on one other (Debian Etch with distro-packaged
Wine 0.9.25-2.1)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15906
Summary: EnumFonts returns each font multiple times
Product: Wine
Version: 1.1.5
Platform: PC-x86-64
URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
us/library/ms533964(VS.85).aspx
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdi32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se
Created an attachment (id=17078)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17078)
Test program executing EnumFonts()
According to the documentation (see URL) the EnumFonts function returns one
(random) font of each available typeface. The Wine implementation returns each
typeface many times.
As a test case I installed the typeface "Signet Roundhand" and ran the attached
test program. Under indows it returns "Signet Roundhand" once. Under wine it
returns it three times, with different values for lfCharSet and tmCharSet.
I also copied the Arial font files from Windows (arial.ttf, ariali.ttf,
arialbd.ttf, and arialbi.ttf) to my $HOME/.fonts directory. Under Windows,
Arial is returned once with the test program. Under Wine it is returned ten(!)
times.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350
Summary: SetClassLongW() to subclass window EDIT control Problem
Product: Wine
Version: 1.0.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: user32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: hongbo(a)njstar.com
CC: hongbo(a)njstar.com
Created an attachment (id=14649)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=14649)
MSVC6 MFC test project with exe in debug dir
Summary:
SetClassLongW(hEditWnd, GCL_WNDPROC, (DWORD)EditWndProc) behave different on
WINE 1.0 from Windows. Any EDIT window created after will be ANSI window on
Windows, but Unicode Windows on Wine.
How To Repeat:
In the attached VC6 MFC ANSI App project, SetClassLongW is called in
-------------------------------------------------------------------
static WNDPROC lpfnOldEditWndProc=NULL;
LONG FAR PASCAL EditWndProc(HWND hWnd, WORD Message, WORD wParam, LONG lParam)
{
return CallWindowProcW((WNDPROC)lpfnOldEditWndProc, hWnd, Message,
wParam,lParam);
}
int CDialogTestView::OnCreate(LPCREATESTRUCT lpCreateStruct)
{
if (CView::OnCreate(lpCreateStruct) == -1)
return -1;
HWND hEditWnd1 = CreateWindowEx(0,"EDIT", "E1",WS_POPUP,0, 0, 1,
1,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL);
lpfnOldEditWndProc =(WNDPROC)SetClassLongW(hEditWnd1, GCL_WNDPROC,
(DWORD)EditWndProc);
// TODO: Add your specialized creation code here
return 0;
}
-------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a EDIT control on the About dialogbox, when click 'OK' on window
the program report the Edit Box is NOT unicode Window. But Under Wine 1.0,
It says 'the Edit Box IS unicode Window'.
To Test: run the EXE in debug folder, Help - About DialogTest - click 'OK'.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12891
Summary: ntdll: exception.ok test fails in PC-BSD but not Linux
Product: Wine
Version: 0.9.60
Platform: PC
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Keywords: testcase
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: ntdll
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=12597)
--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12597)
+relay,+seh,+ntdll in git
exception.c:602: Test failed: expected 4 exceptions, got 0
fixme:seh:fpe_handler untested SIMD exception: 0. Might not work correctly
*** Error code 1
+relay,+seh,+ntdll log attached
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50834
Bug ID: 50834
Summary: That wine uses the kde application style
Product: Wine
Version: 5.22
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: toadfield(a)tutanota.com
Distribution: ---
I hate it how wine programs look like,I want that they look exactly like my kde
theme.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50560
Bug ID: 50560
Summary: Battle.net - starcraft 2
Product: Packaging
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-packages
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: ajsladek(a)protonmail.com
CC: dimesio(a)earthlink.net
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 69236
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69236
Battlenet error
The program stops at login.
It was previously installed and showed the same error at the end of the
installation. It spontaneously opened and I was able to install Starcraft
itself from the main panel of the "Battlenet.net" program. Now it stops before
just logging in.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50833
Bug ID: 50833
Summary: Being able to use Windows 10 theme
Product: Wine
Version: 5.22
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: toadfield(a)tutanota.com
Distribution: ---
The windows xp theme doesn't work for any program,but the windows 10 theme
could.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36282
Bug ID: 36282
Summary: valgrind shows an unitialized write in
ieframe/tests/ie.c
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.13
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: download, source, testcase
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: ieframe
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
==16468== Thread 6:
==16468== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==16468== at 0x4EA8262B: ??? (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==16468== by 0x7BC46BB8: NtWriteFile (file.c:1073)
==16468== by 0x7B83E0AA: WriteFile (file.c:563)
==16468== by 0x5A01BB8: rpcrt4_conn_np_write (rpc_transport.c:444)
==16468== by 0x59F6B27: rpcrt4_conn_write (rpc_binding.h:189)
==16468== by 0x59F8AA9: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:849)
==16468== by 0x59F9BA0: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245)
==16468== by 0x59FCD02: process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:464)
==16468== by 0x59FCF82: RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:519)
==16468== by 0x59FD115: RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:541)
==16468== by 0x7BC909EA: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110)
==16468== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==16468== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630)
==16468== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==16468== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428)
==16468== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==16468== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so)
==16468== Address 0x47f9cf4 is 44 bytes inside a recently re-allocated block
of size 92 alloc'd
==16468== at 0x7BC4C735: notify_alloc (heap.c:255)
==16468== by 0x7BC50F79: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==16468== by 0x59F88E9: RPCRT4_SendWithAuth (rpc_message.c:808)
==16468== by 0x59F9BA0: RPCRT4_Send (rpc_message.c:1245)
==16468== by 0x59FCD02: process_request_packet (rpc_server.c:464)
==16468== by 0x59FCF82: RPCRT4_process_packet (rpc_server.c:519)
==16468== by 0x59FD115: RPCRT4_worker_thread (rpc_server.c:541)
==16468== by 0x7BC909EA: worker_thread_proc (threadpool.c:110)
==16468== by 0x7BC87087: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==16468== by 0x7BC870D0: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2630)
==16468== by 0x7BC87065: ??? (signal_i386.c:2571)
==16468== by 0x7BC8E4B0: start_thread (thread.c:428)
==16468== by 0x4EA7BD89: start_thread (in /usr/lib/libpthread-2.18.so)
==16468== by 0x4E95CA0D: clone (in /usr/lib/libc-2.18.so)
==16468== Uninitialised value was created by a client request
==16468== at 0x7BC4C52C: mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:209)
==16468== by 0x7BC4C697: initialize_block (heap.c:240)
==16468== by 0x7BC50FA3: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1717)
==16468== by 0x501E635: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:186)
==16468== by 0x501EF50: CoTaskMemAlloc (objidl.h:1236)
==16468== by 0x505C935: RemUnknown_RemQueryInterface (stubmanager.c:690)
==16468== by 0x50661C6: IRemUnknown_RemQueryInterface_Stub (dcom_p.c:369)
==16468== by 0x59CA5BF: CStdStubBuffer_Invoke (cstub.c:477)
==16468== by 0x503D280: RPC_ExecuteCall (objidl.h:9086)
==16468== by 0x4FFC1ED: apartment_wndproc (compobj.c:1460)
==16468== by 0x548C509: ??? (winproc.c:173)
==16468== by 0x548C67E: call_window_proc (winproc.c:244)
==16468== by 0x548E817: WINPROC_call_window (winproc.c:900)
==16468== by 0x544FBE4: DispatchMessageW (message.c:4019)
==16468== by 0x4793F60: IEWinMain (iexplore.c:1061)
==16468== by 0x472CA34: wWinMain (main.c:84)
==16468== by 0x472CD21: wmain (exe_wmain.c:51)
==16468== by 0x472CBFC: __wine_spec_exe_wentry (exe_wentry.c:36)
==16468== by 0x7B864247: ??? (process.c:1045)
==16468== by 0x7B864394: start_process (process.c:1097)
==16468==
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
Bug #: 28831
Summary: secur32/tests/schannel.ok: occasional uninitialised
memory read in _gnutls_recv_int() in
test_communication()?
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.30
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: secur32
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: dank(a)kegel.com
Classification: Unclassified
I don't see this on every run, but sometimes Valgrind complains:
Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
at _gnutls_recv_int (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14)
by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14)
by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14)
by ??? (in /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgnutls.so.26.16.14)
by schan_InitializeSecurityContextW (schannel.c:728)
by schan_InitializeSecurityContextA (schannel.c:775)
by InitializeSecurityContextA (wrapper.c:282)
by test_communication (schannel.c:644)
by func_schannel (schannel.c:773)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
Uninitialised value was created by a client request
by mark_block_uninitialized (heap.c:208)
by initialize_block (heap.c:239)
by RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1703)
by init_buffers (schannel.c:496)
by test_communication (schannel.c:633)
by func_schannel (schannel.c:773)
by run_test (test.h:556)
by main (test.h:624)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50879
Bug ID: 50879
Summary: STDOUT output lost from Winelib applications in Wine
6.5 because of start.exe
Product: Wine
Version: 6.5
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: programs
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: mail(a)robbertvanderhelm.nl
Distribution: ---
(split from bug 50869, see there for some other related issues)
When launching Winelib applications in Wine 6.5, all output written to STDOUT
gets lost. I tested this with a simple C++ file compiled with wineg++ that
tries
to print some text using both `printf()` and `std::cout`. Printing to STDERR
using `std::cerr` still works fine.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.