https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57156
Bug ID: 57156
Summary: Not getting forum registration activation link/email
Product: WineHQ.org
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: www-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: winehq(a)jmbreuer.net
Distribution: ---
Because of an issue with winedbg, I wanted to ask in the forums, but after
registering for an account I'm not getting the activation mail.
It says to "contact an administrator", but not how; I can't see any "Contact
Us" links on the forum pages. phpBB only mentions that "Contact Us" for getting
stuff to the administrators is a standard feature and always available IF IT IS
ENABLED, which I guess it's not.
I'm aware this may not be the greatest channel to look for a resolution of my
particular issue, I'm very happy to be pointed somewhere "better". ;-)
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46585
Bug ID: 46585
Summary: Some unicode characters cut off the rest of
description
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: spleefer90(a)gmail.com
CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 63469
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=63469
test.txt with the issue
Looks like posting certain unicode characters makes rest of the description be
cut off.
Here's pasting of contents of the attached test.txt:
Tobias
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57176
Bug ID: 57176
Summary: Accidentally uploaded the wrong screenshot, please
delete
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: other
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: aros(a)gmx.com
CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Please delete attachment 77073.
I've uploaded it accidentally, it wasn't meant to be shared.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56635
Bug ID: 56635
Summary: Wine 9.8 is not listed on Bugzilla
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com
CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Wine 9.8 is not listed on Bugzilla. My understanding was that it was added as
part of the release process. Has something failed to update?
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53652
Bug ID: 53652
Summary: invalid URL in wine-bugs digest email footer
Product: WineHQ Bugzilla
Version: 3.2.3
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: regression
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bugzilla-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com
CC: austinenglish(a)gmail.com, jnewman(a)codeweavers.com,
julliard(a)winehq.org
Distribution: ---
I'm guessing this happened around the mailman upgrade:
Sep 10:
_______________________________________________
wine-bugs mailing list -- wine-bugs(a)winehq.org - To unsubscribe send an email
to wine-bugs-leave(a)winehq.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo/%(_internal_name)s
versus:
July 26:
_______________________________________________
wine-bugs mailing list - wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
https://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-bugs
'bisecting' the regression, it occurred between:
bad: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 46
good: Aug 12 wine-bugs Digest, Vol 205, Issue 45
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56630
Bug ID: 56630
Summary: Broken links in email for "Test Results added to
version ..."
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: 56ms2hl02(a)sneakemail.com
Distribution: ---
In an E-Mail I got:
Test Results added to version GoG of Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri by axm
-------------------------------------------------------
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=3Dversion&iId=3D24358&=
;iTestingId=3D114903
This Test data has been submitted by axm.
... where the link is malformed due to the line break but I also could not fix
it manually.
It should probably be:
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=24358
Note this is the current version and it got autoapproved (probably because I am
the maintainer, too).
Using this search
https://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=link&no_redi…
I found a simimar, but very old and outdated bug report that maybe can be
closed instead:
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25699
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56612
Bug ID: 56612
Summary: AppDB now lists everyone who is e-mailed
Product: WineHQ Apps Database
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: appdb-unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: imwellcushtymelike(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ---
Created attachment 76367
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=76367
Screenshot (censored)
I've received a few e-mails from the AppDB, which is the norm. It used to only
list me in the To:, now it lists everyone who receives the e-mail.
Leaking the user's e-mail addresses could be considered a data breach.
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28467
Summary: Chromium Browser restore button doesn't work
Product: Wine
Version: 1.3.28
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: fracting(a)gmail.com
1. Download chromium from
http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/snapshots/Win/95816/chrome-win32.zip
unpack chrome-win32.zip, cd to the directory.
2. start chrome.exe with --no-sandbox, works around Bug 21232
$ wine chrome.exe --no-sandbox
Notice that the chrome window is decorated by the Linux native window manager.
Is it a bug? On windows, chrome have no traditional "window bar".
Now there is two "Maximal" button: one is drawn by Linux native window manager,
the other is drawed by wine chrome browser it self.
3. Click on the "Maximal" button which is drawn by Linux native window manager,
then chrome browser switch to maximal mode as expect.
This time, the Linux native window bar is disappear.
4. Click on the "Restore" button of wine chrome browser. However it doesn't
work. Wine chrome switch to normal mode for a second, then switch back to
maximal mode automatically.
I use ubuntu 11.04 , with traditional gnome desktop, gnome 2.32.1 .
There is some ways to work around:
I. Instead of clicking on the native "Maximal" button in step 3, try to click
the wine chrome "Maximal" button, then everything works as expect.
II. Do not set "Allow the window manager to decorate the windows" in winecfg,
then everything works as expect.
III. Do not set "Allow the window manager to control the windows" in winecfg,
then everything works as expect.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56647
Bug ID: 56647
Summary: ntdll-Junction_Points prevent rustup from correctly
installing a toolchain
Product: Wine-staging
Version: 9.8
Hardware: x86-64
URL: https://rustup.rs/
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: -unknown
Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
Reporter: lorenzofer(a)live.it
CC: leslie_alistair(a)hotmail.com, z.figura12(a)gmail.com
Distribution: ArchLinux
Created attachment 76423
--> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=76423
return STATUS_NOT_A_REPARSE_POINT instead of STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
Hi.
With the recent rustup 1.27.0 using wine-staging with the
ntdll-Junction_Points patches, the toolchain installation doesn't complete
properly, failing to write to the settings.toml under the prefix home .rustup
directory info.
A bug with the same root cause is also present on rustup 1.26.0 where while the
installation was completing properly, it was failing to remove the
.rustup/tmp/* directories, causing issues with subsequent installations.
Both bugs express the same behavioral pattern with few differences. I
investigated the directory bug firstly, so I will detail this, and confirmed
that the problem and the expected solution are the same.
Rustup (or one of it's dependency managing files) get the handle of the
temporary directory using CreateFileW and then checking if it's a reparse point
using DeviceIoControl with FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT.
The directories (and the file) aren't reparse points at all, so the readlink
fails returining EINVAL.
This EINVAL is then mapped to an NT_STATUS using errno_to_status that map
EINVAL to STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
However this mapping is incorrect for FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT as in this case
applications that handle this case like rustup try to handle this case by
epxecting STATUS_NOT_A_REPARSE_POINT.
Returning STATUS_NOT_A_REPARSE_POINT in this case allow rustup to work (both
versions )
Attaching a patch to show the change in the file.c code (and restored also the
out_buffer check)
--
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.