http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218
Summary: Installing Adaytum Analyst : Unable to extract the file
(null)
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P4
Component: wine-misc
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: derek(a)gnue.org
During install of Adaytum Analyst on Debian Unstable (Wine 20021219) all goes
well with the setup and it installs Adobe Acrobat fine and launches into the
setup for Analyst. However, midway through the install it throws a
InstallShield error:
995: Internal error in Windows Installer
followed by InstallShield error:
1611: Unable to extract the file (null).
Wine itself never crashes.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885
dclark(a)akamail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From dclark(a)akamail.com 2003-01-09 14:18 -------
Fixed by:
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-cvs/2003/01/0159.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983
mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |trivial
Component|wine-binary |wine-dos
Priority|P1 |P5
Version|20020804 |unspecified
------- Additional Comments From mcbridematt(a)hotmail.com 2003-01-09 00:35 -------
Changing component to wine-dos. Core Contingency now installs under CVS. Moving
severity to trivial as their is only one working example.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650
pouech(a)winehq.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |990
------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:43 -------
added dependency to 990
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2003-01-08 14:43 -------
Would this work for dumping a stack trace when winedbg is triggered on an
unhandled SEH?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845
fgouget(a)codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From fgouget(a)codeweavers.com 2003-01-08 14:42 -------
I have not tested remote debugging myself but others on the list seem to be
using it. So I guess this task can be considered done (new bug reports can be
opened for future bugs if needed).
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833
pouech(a)winehq.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |pouech(a)winehq.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:40 -------
I already planned to implement it. Among the difficulties to deal with:
- creation of the calling stack (we could use the program's own stack, but that
could be risky)
- there's no information in current stabs format whether a function is stdcall
or cdecl, which could of course generate some bad bad bad results ;-) (we could
try to infer it from some other bits... function prolog/epilog for example)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063
pouech(a)winehq.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|wine-bugs(a)winehq.com |pouech(a)winehq.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:38 -------
do you have the URL to test such a program ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845
------- Additional Comments From pouech(a)winehq.com 2003-01-08 14:33 -------
I think we do have the correct code, don't we ?
ready for closing the bug ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.