http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
everconfirmed|0 |1
------- Additional Comments From andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de 2002-10-22 17:57 -------
Hmm, sounds like our implementation of pthread_mutex_lock has a problem here
for some mysterious reason...
Which libc6 version do you have, BTW ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
------- Additional Comments From bsmith3(a)charter.net 2002-10-22 14:55 -------
Created an attachment (id=318)
results of gdb backtrace
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090
------- Additional Comments From depanofsky97(a)alumni.amherst.edu 2002-10-21 22:06 -------
This is not a problem with a bad glibc version. Although this problem will go
away when wine is re-compiled with the new glibc installed, the problem is in
the wine source, not in glibc. From the glibc FAQ 3.12:
ISO C states that identifiers beginning with an underscore are internal to
the libc. An application program normally shouldn't use those internal
interfaces (there are exceptions, e.g. __ivaliduser). If a program uses
these interfaces, it's broken. These internal interfaces might change
between glibc releases or dropped completely.
The problem with a wine linked with glibc-2.2 not running with glibc-2.3 is
because wine uses __libc_fork in scheduler/pthread.c and apparently, this
interface has finally been dropped. I immagine that since __libc_fork is only
used if (__GLIBC__ == 2) && (__GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 1) && defined(HAVE___LIBC_FORK)
that wine can do without this hack.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
Summary: crash when running Shake 2.4 and workaround
Product: Wine
Version: 20020904
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: wine-x11driver
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.com
ReportedBy: chicorico81(a)hotmail.com
I'm running NothingReal's (now apple's) Shake 2.4 under wine 20021007. I can
cause a crash by launching shake, creating a "colorcorrect" node (under the
"color" tab bottom left), and then clicking on the "curves" tab near the bottom
right of the screen. The crash occurs in graphics/x11drv/dib.c in
X11DRV_DIB_Convert_888_to_0888_asis(). As a workaround, if I add code at the
beginning of that function to return if srclinebytes < 0, then everything works
fine.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=90
------- Additional Comments From mstefani(a)redhat.com 2002-10-21 16:38 -------
Well keep it until the whole wine compiles with "-DSTRICT" turned on (that means
until no -DWINE_NO_STRICT remains in any dll). I've closed all remaining
"Convert $handle to a void*" bug reports but we need to open now a bug for every
dll that defines WINE_NO_STRICT.
To make a dll compile with -DSTRICT do the following:
- remove -DWINE_NO_STRICT from the dll's Makefile.in and regenerate the Makefile
- do a make clean in that dll
- do a make and fix all warnings, even the "int format, HANDLE arg" warnings. To
fix wrong handle conversions, use the tips given in this bug report before.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=90>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092
------- Additional Comments From news.tr(a)myrealbox.com 2002-10-21 12:40 -------
Hello
I have same problems at Suse 8.0 too.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507
This bug depends on bug 508, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502
This bug depends on bug 508, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500
This bug depends on bug 508, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489
This bug depends on bug 508, which changed state:
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.