http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #42 from diafero@arcor.de 2007-11-16 08:07:25 --- That's right, the patch necessary for Uru also gets much smaller this way ;-)
Do you have an idea how the behaviour Uru needs (which is obviously the one Windows provides) can be implemented without this patch? Is it included in one of the tests marked as "todo_wine"? It'd be great if Uru was supported out-of-the-box :) (not that you misunderstand me - I really appreciate what we already have. Without your patches playing Uru on Linux would be completely impossible. Thank you very much for your work!)