wine-devel October 2012

wine-devel@winehq.org

70 participants
272 discussions

Re: [1/2] vbscript: Support vb* constants for message box buttons
by Jacek Caban 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi Nikolay, On 10/03/12 13:34, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Support vb* constants for message box buttons How about using MB_* constants from winuser.h instead of hardcoding them here? Other than that, the patch looks good to me. Jacek

2 1

Re: imm32: have IMM class return TRUE for WM_QUERYENDSESSION
by Alexandre Julliard 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > resolves bug 31832 > --- > dlls/imm32/imm.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Is there any reason why we are not simply calling DefWindowProc? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Re: [2/2] vbscript: Support vb* constants for message box return value (try2)
by Marvin 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21981 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [1/2] vbscript: Support vb* constants for message box buttons (try2)
by Marvin 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21980 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [2/2] vbscript: Support vb* constants for message box return value
by Marvin 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21979 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [1/2] vbscript: Support vb* constants for message box buttons
by Marvin 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=21978 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [2/2] oledb32: Add support for IDBInitialize interface in IDataInitialize
by Marvin 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

1 0

Re: wininet: Fixed failing test
by Dmitry Timoshkov 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > - ok(ret, "GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW failed with error %d\n", GetLastError()); > + ok(ret || broken(!ret) /* IE6 */, "GetUrlCacheEntryInfoExW failed with error %d\n", GetLastError()); This kind of blanket test results coverage is broken from the start. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] hhctrl.ocx: Fix removing a window from the help list when window creation fails.
by Jacek Caban 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

On 10/02/12 23:02, Erich E. Hoover wrote: > If a cleanup occurs because HTML Help window creation fails then > list_remove() causes a crash, since the window was never added to the > window list. The attached patch fixes this issue, allowing safe > reloading of files (needed for part 2). This looks like a hack. It would be better to have always valid list entry (if this really can't be added to the list earlier, you may always initialize it by list_init) or make sure to not call ReleaseHelpViewer before HHInfo is fully initialized. Jacek

1 0

Re:cmd: /r is equivalent to /c
by Ann and Jason Edmeades 03 Oct '12

03 Oct '12

Concept of patch is fine (and we ought to support it), but I dont think this would work as coded (if (tolowerW(c)=='c'||'r') will always be true). Also, can you add a quick test for it (there's cmd.exe /c tests - just add a cmd.exe /r echo test worked). PS You might want to just hold off until the patch I submitted last night gets committed as well otherwise there will be merge conflicts ("Change command line parsing away from argv/argc")

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel October 2012