wine-devel May 2013

wine-devel@winehq.org

77 participants
183 discussions

Re: [PATCH 4/6] gdi32: Use the default character when the glyph is missing.
by Alexandre Julliard 17 May '13

17 May '13

Akihiro Sagawa <sagawa.aki(a)gmail.com> writes: > This change is useful for a bitmap font. Because its glyph index 0 isn't the > default glyph in some cases. This doesn't seem to match what GetGlyphIndices does, and we probably don't want to do that in two different places. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2]vbscript: Implemented builtin function CBool
by Marvin 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25605 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2]vbscript: Implemented builtin function CInt
by Marvin 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25604 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH] wined3d: Only display a fixme when software processing is requested in wined3d_device_set_software_vertex_processing.
by Austin English 17 May '13

17 May '13

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Christian Costa <titan.costa(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Also remove fixme in wined3d_device_get_software_vertex_processing since it does what it is supposed to do. > --- > dlls/wined3d/device.c | 12 ++---------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/device.c b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > index 47da78b..89fc525 100644 > --- a/dlls/wined3d/device.c > +++ b/dlls/wined3d/device.c > @@ -4281,9 +4281,9 @@ void CDECL wined3d_device_set_software_vertex_processing(struct wined3d_device * > > TRACE("device %p, software %#x.\n", device, software); > > - if (!warned) > + if (software && !warned) > { > - FIXME("device %p, software %#x stub!\n", device, software); > + FIXME("Software vertex processing not supported. Fake it and use harware one."); > warned = TRUE; Typo, should be hardware. -- -Austin

2 1

Re: msvcp90: Prefer native version.
by Piotr Caban 17 May '13

17 May '13

On 05/17/13 08:01, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Just like msvcp60,msvcp70,msvcp71,msvcp80,msvcp100,msvcp110 do. > --- > dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c b/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c > index 7a7aafe..ce56c14 100644 > --- a/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c > +++ b/dlls/msvcp90/msvcp90_main.c > @@ -80,10 +80,13 @@ static void init_cxx_funcs(void) > > BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE hinstDLL, DWORD fdwReason, LPVOID lpvReserved) > { > - TRACE("(0x%p, %d, %p)\n", hinstDLL, fdwReason, lpvReserved); > + TRACE("(%p,%u,%p)\n", hinstDLL, fdwReason, lpvReserved); > > switch (fdwReason) > { > + case DLL_WINE_PREATTACH: > + return FALSE; /* prefer native version */ > + > case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH: > init_cxx_funcs(); > init_lockit(); > msvcp90 has some wine specific exports. This patch breaks other msvcpXX dlls when native msvcp90 is installed.

3 5

GSoC 2013 - Registry Merging Project
by orzhvs 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi. I'm applying for the Google Summer of Code 2013, this is my proposal for the registry merging project. I'll work on improving Wine's registry in its stability and simulation to solve frequently seen non user-friendly problems, which usually caused by that application or system settings are not stored and fetched correctly. Project & My Understand: I'm most interested in the project "Registry - implement merging between HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT and HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes". Its core task is to implement RegOpenUserClassesRoot, which returns a key token of merging view of HKCU & HKLM classes rather than present returning HKCR Classes. The difficulity is that as a view of two independent registry trees, how to treat conflicts and make changes to two seperated entrys when using HKCR as root, and how to achieve the function with no or least effect on other part of registry operation such as RegOpenKeyExX. I have some seed ideas that maybe not mature but I like solving problems initially from a burst port : Scheme 1. Registry operations based on hKey ( handle ) under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT will be degeneration to full path in text, like "HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Subdir1", and try the operation after "HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT" replaced with "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes" and "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes" in order, only the first success operation will be applied. This may satisfy the demand, both for query and modify. For details like the correct order, I'll make it out once get working on it. In this way, the HKCR key subtree does not exist in fact but only exists as a name. Scheme 2. After the base registry is initialized, build the HKCR's subkey trees with a new pulled in object type (say it 'symbol link') that directly point to the correct keys from HKLM or HKCU. Thus operation in HKCR tree are redirected to corresponding branch internally. When operating the HKCR itself, like creating new subkeys direct under HKCR, the operation is redirected to HKCU classes. This scheme seems more fluent but needs some tricks in the server part. What I'll Do : First of all I'll do a lot of tests on pure winows registry to definite my questions and guesses, write one or more test reports on different version of windows, some of which is already being done now. Followed by I will design the algorithms and data structures and make a complete development planation. Then enjoying coding and debuging Wine. I love the procedure, during the longest part of this project, keep writing daily report. Got the plan finished, I will applying improvement. Finally strict tests will be done to show if I achieved the final goal and a conclude paper will be carefully submitted. I'd like not only settle down the main project, but also several ideas to make Wine better, which are found in my daily use of Wine, such as add support for the shell context menu in Wine explorer for many convenient shotcuts of some software like the famous 7zip. I'll do this once time allows. Why Me : I myself is a faithful user of Wine. I know the thought of Wine and know not only basic usage but also a little implement of it. I understand Windows registry both Windows API pretty well from nearly 8 years coding. Have done much test and hooks in windows including RegXXX in advapi32.dll or lower level NtOpenKey in ntdll.dll. Further more, I used to do some kernel debug tests and hacks on registry, like hiding, protecting a subkey from regedit, resolving values from hive file rather than using API. These things are done under interests. I've been learning Windows API and OS theories from books and network like msdn for long. Ofcourse there will be no problem in registry knowledge. It's usual for me to write codes more than 1000 lines a day, for self use or for the competation ACM. I believe that I'm a careful man in codes and other things, I like discovering, guessing and proving. To prove I've developed a not too bad coding style, please refer to my submisions on codeforces http://codeforces.com/submissions/adnim (to view code click numbers under column "#"). And this may be a little evidence denoting that at least I've used git before, https://code.google.com/p/eryapass/ I know what should I do and what should not. I'm sure aware of the legal requirements. All of my tests will be done only in the black-box ways. No reverse work on Windows files is allowed and needed in Wine project, though I'm good at that. All codes will be written creatively and nothing will be copied from existing ones like WRK, RcactOS or something else. I love open source. I benefited much from the open source world and I'd be really happy to contribute to it one day. The last but most important, I'm much willing and I'm looking forward to throwing myself among the crowd of codes this entire summer, making maxium effort to improve Wine. I'd like schedule my personal activities to avoid conflicts with the development, meaning it won't be too busy in my schoolwork. Wine & Me : In my childhood, I've been coding in F-Basic on Subor (a kind of TV-based computer made in China) when friends are playing football in yard, at about 8 years old. When I was 12 years old, i was building some little games to happy classmates, and have learned c and c++ 2 years latter, then x86 asm 2 more years latter. And have done some graduation-designs for college brothers before I got to university. Also I've developed some projects for local companies. I first installed Ubuntu in 2010 and gradually I'm interested in open source projects. I'm 21 years old now, studying software engineering in Shandong University of Science and Technology in China. I'm a really enthusiastic user of Wine, who has been using it from version 1.2 to 1.4, on ubuntu, debian and gentoo. Since the first day I apt-got it I could not help trying all applications I used in Windows to it and making them running stably, during which I have learned much about configuring Wine. Another day I began to emerging that and I was once deep interested in building my customed Wine and Wine based tests. I heard about GSoC last year but missed the time. This year, I decided that I will try my best to contribute, transform my ideas to powerful codes that people will run with satisfaction. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks. Guo Jian

3 9

gdi32: GetGlyphIndices doesn't substitute glyph incorrect
by Aric Stewart 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi there, I know I am a year late to the party here but I am digging deep into tategaki for a few Japanese programs that are having serious rendering issues and I believe that this patch is incorrect. I am attaching the test patch that proves it to me. Kusanagi-san, we should try to make sure that this does not break what it was that you where trying to fix with your original patch. -aric

2 4

Re: [PATCH 5/5] mshtml: Added whitespace parser tests.
by Marvin 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25599 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/5] mshtml: Added parsing custom tag name tests.
by Marvin 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25598 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/5] mshtml: Added more parser compatMode tests.
by Marvin 17 May '13

17 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25597 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
19
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel May 2013