Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how
to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119159
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
taskschd:
scheduler.c:790: Test failed: DeleteTask error 0x80070005
scheduler.c:786: Test failed: 1: expected 0, got 0x800700b7
scheduler.c:786: Test failed: 2: expected 0x80070002, got 0
scheduler.c:790: Test failed: DeleteTask error 0x80070005
scheduler.c:790: Test failed: DeleteTask error 0x80070005
scheduler.c:806: Test failed: RegisterTask error 0x800700b7
scheduler.c:937: Test failed: DeleteTask error 0x80070005
scheduler.c:939: Test failed: DeleteTask error 0x80070005
scheduler.c:942: Test failed: expected ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND, got 0x80070005
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119152
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:6295: Test succeeded inside todo block: expected timeout
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how
to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119127
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:5008: Test failed: Didn't expect a WM_USER_NOTIFY message (event: 2)
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how
to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119126
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: RMDIR: expected notification type 10, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:4991: Test failed: MKDIR: expected notification type 8, got: 40000
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
shell32:
shlfolder.c:5008: Test failed: Didn't expect a WM_USER_NOTIFY message (event: 2)
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119099
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
ws2_32:
protocol.c:2067: Test failed: wait failed
protocol.c:2069: Test failed: overlapped result is 10036
protocol.c:2071: Test failed: overlapped.Internal = 2734
protocol.c:2073: Test failed: got 0
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how
to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details:
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119101
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
ntdll:
change.c:241: Test failed: should be ready
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119098
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1311: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119097
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1307: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1310: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119096
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1306: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1309: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=119095
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
msvcrt:
cpp.c:1305: Test failed: 132: Got name "??__K_l@@YA?AUCC@@I@Z"
cpp.c:1308: Test failed: 132: Expected "struct CC __cdecl operator "" _l(unsigned int)"