wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

1 participants
84478 discussions

Re: PATCH: Move 16-bit COMM stuff to USER, where it belongs
by Alexandre Julliard 19 Jun '01

19 Jun '01

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > Move 16-bit COMM stuff to USER, where it belongs. While the idea of the patch is correct, I think it would be much better to fix the huge code duplication while everything is in the same file. The 16-bit stuff should be implemented on top of the 32-bit stuff, instead of duplicating most of it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: Use the libreadline in Winedbg, if available
by Alexandre Julliard 19 Jun '01

19 Jun '01

Patrik Stridvall <ps(a)leissner.se> writes: > No, it is enough that it is GPL compatible which the Wine license is. But then the code can no longer be distributed under a non GPL compatible license, while this is allowed by the Wine license. I think the benefit of using readline in the debugger is much too small to justify the potential license issues this would cause. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Lost mail
by Alexandre Julliard 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

Folks, I have been forced to change ISPs over the week-end, and it seems the old and new ISP couldn't agree on when to do the switch, so any mail sent to me during the week-end probably got forwarded to /dev/null. Also could people who submitted a patch to wine-patches please send me a private copy? I know they are on the mailing list archive, but it makes my life a lot easier to have everything in my mail box. Thanks. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

set_file_pointer and 64 bit file access
by Bill Medland 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

I see we are in the middle of converting set_file_pointer towards 64 bit file systems. Currently the code is confused as to when to change from unsigned to signed int for the low 32 bits. Should it happen in SetFilePointer before sending the request (which means we end up changing the request format) or should it happen within set_file_pointer (after changing the argument back to a signed int; this would also require work in SetFilePointer to get it to set up the request correctly). Any views? Bill

1 0

RE: Use the libreadline in Winedbg, if available
by Ove Kaaven 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Patrik Stridvall wrote: > A minor notice. Readline is GPL:ed (not LGPL:ed) which is not so good. > While it is without doubt legal for us to use and distribute, > it might cause trouble for other people. Not as long as it's optional (that patch even supported ./configure --without-readline, so no trouble, such people would just disable it).

1 0

RE: Use the libreadline in Winedbg, if available
by Patrik Stridvall 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:10:14PM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > at present, wine uses unconditionally a self supplied readline > > function. Appended patch tries to find out if libreadline > is available > > and uses libreadline if available. I configured with and without > > libreadline and successfully compiled winedbg on my system. > > libreadline is a static library on my system and winedbg > grew 90 kByte > > stripped and 110 kByte compiled with -g. > > You are not allowed to link readline aganst non GPL code to > my knowledge. No, it is enough that it is GPL compatible which the Wine license is. Whether we should is another matter though. Just linking it to the debugger is rather harmless IMHO though.

2 1

Re: Use the libreadline in Winedbg, if available
by Marcus Meissner 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 04:10:14PM +0200, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > Hallo, > > at present, wine uses unconditionally a self supplied readline > function. Appended patch tries to find out if libreadline is available > and uses libreadline if available. I configured with and without > libreadline and successfully compiled winedbg on my system. > libreadline is a static library on my system and winedbg grew 90 kByte > stripped and 110 kByte compiled with -g. You are not allowed to link readline aganst non GPL code to my knowledge. Ciao, Marcus

1 0

Dosvm not initialized for Direct port access
by Uwe Bonnes 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

Hallo, some license manager dll (lmgr327a) manages to read IOPORT 0x40 from 32-bit code. This results in an access to Dosvm.GetTimer() in line 297 in ioports.c, and as Dosvm isn't initialized this results in a crash. =>0 0x00000000 (ebp=404e4b38) 1 0x400cd595 (IO_inport+0x205(port=0x40, size=0x1) [ioports.c:297] in libntdll.so) (ebp=404e4b38, null call assumed) 2 0x400a7405 (INSTR_inport+0x25(port=0x40, size=0x1, context=0x404e4c50) [instr.c:328] in libntdll.so) (ebp=404e4b58) 3 0x400a888c (INSTR_EmulateInstruction+0x12cc(context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50, context=0x404e4c50) [instr.c:745] in libntdll.so) (ebp=404e4bc4) 4 0x400733c9 (do_segv+0x109(context=0x404e4c50, trap_code=0xd, cr2=0x0, err_code=0x0) [signal_i386.c:671] in libntdll.so) (ebp=404e4c2c) 5 0x4007368d (segv_handler+0x3d(__signal=0xb, __context=0x0) [signal_i386.c:787] in libntdll.so) (ebp=404e4d1c) 6 0x4029fb58 (__restore [sigaction.c] in libc.so.6) (ebp=405f57a0) 7 0x1c0b0004 (LMGR327A.DLL..reloc+0xbfe2004) (ebp=04007242) Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

1 0

16-bit and 32-bit separation
by Patrik Stridvall 18 Jun '01

18 Jun '01

[Since the subject it up because of Dimitry's "Move 16-bit COMM stuff to USER, where it belongs" patch] My new tool winapi_fixup could without to much effort be extended to facillitate separation of 16-bit and 32-bit stuff by moving the 16-bit parts of a file (example: foo.c) to a new 16-bit only file (example: foo16.c). Of course because of dependecies, includes and such things it can only be partly automatic and it will in most cases require quite a lot editing afterwards, so the questions (primarily to Alexandre but other replies welcome to) are: 1. Will/Should Alexandre accept such patches at all? 2. Is it a useful effort to get the 16-bit stuff out of the way so we don't have to see it in the files when editing the 32-bit stuff? 3. Is it a useful effort to make it possible to have --disable-win16 configure option to compile out as much Win16 stuff as possible in order to save space in the binaries for say embedded stuff. 4. While this certainly it not a high or even medium priority effort, should it have low, very low or extremly low priority? PS. I have other stuff planed so I certainly do not lack things to do. However since the subject is up I might just as well ask.

1 0

SIGSEGV while trying to run Word97
by Heiko Nardmann 17 Jun '01

17 Jun '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am continously getting a dialog "Nicht genügend Arbeitsspeicher oder unzureichender Speicherplatz, um Word auszuführen" (German version). After trying to examine this problem with debugmsg all (without real success) I added an strace call to the whole call. This resulted in a log file which tells me that a SIGSEGV occurrs. Here is a part of the strace log file which contains the SIGSEGV message. After that the appropriate 'debugmsg all' part follows. What can be done to shed more light onto this problem? strace log: write(2, "08069280:trace:win32:_LeaveSysLe"..., 112) = 112 write(2, "08069280:Ret user32.CreateWindo"..., 68) = 68 write(2, "08069280:RET mso97.486: _MsoCre"..., 84) = 84 write(2, "08069280:trace:heap:HeapFree (40"..., 74) = 74 write(2, "08069280:Call kernel32.GetVersio"..., 49) = 49 write(2, "08069280:Ret kernel32.GetVersio"..., 65) = 65 write(2, "08069280:Call kernel32.GetVersio"..., 60) = 60 write(2, "08069280:Ret kernel32.GetVersio"..., 68) = 68 write(2, "08069280:Call kernel32.GlobalMem"..., 65) = 65 time(NULL) = 992531763 time(NULL) = 992531763 open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY) = 11 fstat(11, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 old_mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x4035c000 read(11, " total: used: free:"..., 1024) = 319 read(11, "", 1024) = 0 close(11) = 0 munmap(0x4035c000, 4096) = 0 write(2, "08069280:Ret kernel32.GlobalMem"..., 73) = 73 write(2, "08069280:CALL mso97.394: _MsoFCr"..., 147) = 147 write(2, ") ret=30011010\n", 15) = 15 write(2, "08069280:Call kernel32.VirtualAl"..., 86) = 86 write(2, "08069280:trace:virtual:VirtualAl"..., 68) = 68 mmap2(NULL, 131072, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) old_mmap(NULL, 131072, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40e90000 munmap(0x40ea0000, 65536) = 0 write(2, "View: 40e90000 - 40e9ffff (vallo"..., 35) = 35 write(2, " 40e90000 - 40e9ffff -----\n", 32) = 32 write(2, "08069280:Ret kernel32.VirtualAl"..., 67) = 67 write(2, "08069280:Call kernel32.VirtualAl"..., 86) = 86 write(2, "08069280:trace:virtual:VirtualAl"..., 68) = 68 write(2, "08069280:trace:virtual:VIRTUAL_S"..., 63) = 63 mprotect(0x40e90000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE) = 0 write(2, "View: 40e90000 - 40e9ffff (vallo"..., 35) = 35 write(2, " 40e90000 - 40e90fff c-rW-\n", 32) = 32 write(2, " 40e91000 - 40e9ffff -----\n", 32) = 32 write(2, "08069280:Ret kernel32.VirtualAl"..., 67) = 67 - --- SIGSEGV (Speicherzugriffsfehler) --- write(2, "08069280:RET mso97.394: _MsoFCr"..., 126) = 126 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT ALRM IO], [], 8) = 0 write(5, "F\0\0\0\0\0\34\1<\0336@\1\0\0\0\304\357\17@\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 read(6, "F\0\0\0\0\0\34\1\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0 write(2, "08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandl"..., 87) = 87 write(2, "08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlUnwind"..., 55) = 55 write(2, "08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandl"..., 87) = 87 write(2, "08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandl"..., 54) = 54 - --- SIGSEGV (Speicherzugriffsfehler) --- write(2, "08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseE"..., 63) = 63 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT ALRM IO], [], 8) = 0 write(5, "F\0\0\0\0\0\34\1<\0336@\1\0\0\0\304\357\17@\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 read(6, "F\0\0\0\0\0\34\1\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0 wine debug log: 08069280:trace:win32:_LeaveSysLevel (0x40753a74, level 2): thread 0x8069280 (fs 008f, pid 24063) count after 0 08069280:Ret user32.CreateWindowExW() retval=00000138 ret=306cc216 08069280:RET mso97.486: _MsoCreateMonitorWindow@0() retval = 00000000 ret=3000162f 08069280:trace:heap:HeapFree (40360000,00000002,403a4a80): returning TRUE 08069280:Call kernel32.GetVersion() ret=30001984 08069280:Ret kernel32.GetVersion() retval=05650004 ret=30001984 08069280:Call kernel32.GetVersionExA(405c686c) ret=300019b5 08069280:Ret kernel32.GetVersionExA() retval=00000001 ret=300019b5 08069280:Call kernel32.GlobalMemoryStatus(405c6900) ret=300019e2 08069280:Ret kernel32.GlobalMemoryStatus() retval=405c6900 ret=300019e2 08069280:CALL mso97.394: _MsoFCreateIPref@28(<unknown, check return>08069280:trace:heap:HeapAlloc (40360000,00000002,00000040): returning 403a4b98 ) ret=30011010 08069280:Call kernel32.VirtualAlloc(00000000,0000fffc,00002000,00000001) ret=3070b360 08069280:trace:virtual:VirtualAlloc 00000000 0000fffc 2000 00000001 View: 40e90000 - 40e9ffff (valloc) 40e90000 - 40e9ffff ----- 08069280:Ret kernel32.VirtualAlloc() retval=40e90000 ret=3070b360 08069280:Call kernel32.VirtualAlloc(40e90000,00001000,00001000,00000004) ret=3070b38b 08069280:trace:virtual:VirtualAlloc 40e90000 00001000 1000 00000004 08069280:trace:virtual:VIRTUAL_SetProt 40e90000-40e90fff c-rW- View: 40e90000 - 40e9ffff (valloc) 40e90000 - 40e90fff c-rW- 40e91000 - 40e9ffff ----- 08069280:Ret kernel32.VirtualAlloc() retval=40e90000 ret=3070b38b 08069280:RET mso97.394: _MsoFCreateIPref@28(30011020,00000000,08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 08069280: queue_exception_event( first=1, record={context={flags=00000000,eax=00000000,ebx=400fefc4,ecx=4d535744,edx=00000000,esi=00000000,edi=00000007,ebp=405c6790,eip=400c8aca,esp=405c66cc,eflags=00010246,cs=0023,ds=002b,es=002b,fs=008f,gs=0000,dr0=00000000,dr1=00000000,dr2=00000000,dr3=00000000,dr6=00000000,dr7=00000000,float={00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000}},rec={code=c0000005,flags=0,rec=(nil),addr=0x400c8aca,params={0,4d535744}} ) 08069280: queue_exception_event() = 0 { handle=0 } 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x4005b520 code=c0000005 flags=0 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlUnwind code=c0000005 flags=2 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x4005ad80 code=c0000005 flags=2 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler handler returned 1 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlRaiseException code=c0000005 flags=0 08069280: queue_exception_event( first=1, record={context={flags=00000000,eax=00000000,ebx=400fefc4,ecx=4d535744,edx=00000000,esi=00000000,edi=00000007,ebp=405c6790,eip=400c8baa,esp=405c66cc,eflags=00010246,cs=0023,ds=002b,es=002b,fs=008f,gs=0000,dr0=00000000,dr1=00000000,dr2=00000000,dr3=00000000,dr6=00000000,dr7=00000000,float={00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000}},rec={code=c0000005,flags=0,rec=(nil),addr=0x400c8baa,params={0,4d535744}} ) 08069280: queue_exception_event() = 0 { handle=0 } 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x4005b520 code=c0000005 flags=0 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_RtlUnwind code=c0000005 flags=2 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler calling handler at 0x4005ad80 code=c0000005 flags=2 08069280:trace:seh:EXC_CallHandler handler returned 1 - -- Heiko Nardmann (Dipl.-Ing.), h.nardmann(a)secunet.de, Software Development secunet Security Networks AG - Sicherheit in Netzwerken (www.secunet.de), Weidenauer Str. 223-225, D-57076 Siegen Tel. : +49 271 48950-13, Fax : +49 271 48950-50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7KcuPpm53PRScYygRAlfZAJ91r/8CwDzWpu0TU0vB+FRP18w14QCg4sCK GBnoWm0xkKgHgFucJcNrsno= =8hel -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel