Re: [usrmarshal] Adjust new tests to pass on win9x platforms.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Jeremy White  writes:
> > It looks like a good place to use broken().
>
> I don't think it's broken on win98; it looks as though
> they do 4 byte alignment prior to the data structure in win9x, 
> and winnt and on seem to do 8 byte alignment prior to the
> data chunk.  That results in a 4 byte difference.

It should really do 8 byte alignment for 64-bit types. I think that
qualifies as broken.