Re: [2/2] server: A being destroyed object may need to access other objects using a handle.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dmitry Timoshkov  writes:
> Alexandre Julliard  wrote:
> > > > > --- a/server/handle.c
> > > > > +++ b/server/handle.c
> > > > > @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ static void handle_table_destroy( struct object *obj )
> > > > >      for (i = 0, entry = table->entries; i <= table->last; i++, entry++)
> > > > >      {
> > > > >          struct object *obj = entry->ptr;
> > > > > -
> > > > >    entry->ptr = NULL;
> > > > >    if (obj) release_object( obj );
> > > >
> > > > You can't do that, the object can't be accessed after being released.
> > >
> > > Being released doesn't mean destroyed. An object gets destroyed only if its
> > > refcount drops to 0.
> >
> > Obviously, but in general the handle will be the only reference.
>
> Then I don't understand what you mean regarding the code snippet above.

After release_object, the object will have been freed if this was the
last reference. You can't keep a pointer to it.