On 07/02/2008, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
"Reece Dunn" msclrhd@googlemail.com writes:
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c index 7e560d2..bfdb0af 100644 --- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c +++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static void test_GetGlyphIndices(void) flags |= GGI_MARK_NONEXISTING_GLYPHS; charcount = pGetGlyphIndicesW(hdc, testtext, (sizeof(testtext)/2)-1, glyphs, flags); ok(charcount == 5, "GetGlyphIndices count of glyphs should = 5 not %d\n", charcount);
- ok((glyphs[4] == 0x001f || glyphs[4] == UNICODE_NOCHAR /* Vista */), "GetGlyphIndices should have returned a nonexistent char not %04x\n", glyphs[4]);
- ok((glyphs[4] == 0x001f || glyphs[4] == UNICODE_NOCHAR /* Vista */), "GetGlyphIndices should have returned a nonexistent char or UNICODE_NOCHAR, not %04x\n", glyphs[4]);
UNICODE_NOCHAR is a nonexistent char too. And if someone really cares about the exact details they can always look at the test, we don't need to duplicate all of it in the error message.
Ok, I'll drop this patch from my list.
- Reece