Re: MSCMS: new dll

[Hans Leidekker]

On Sunday 19 September 2004 14:43, Robert Shearman wrote:
> No. I am asking whether it will end up sitting there remaining 5% 
> implemented (I think the 25% on the DLLs status page is a little 
> generous) because no-one will have the time and expertise to implement 
> the rest. Admittedly, this is different from SHDOCVW where it consists 
> of many undocumented functions and interfaces.

I don't think it's that bad with MSCMS. It's pretty well documented,
ICC profiles are standardized and LittleCMS appears to supply at
least the basic functionality that I suspect most apps are after,
which is translating an image from one color space into another.

-Hans