Jeremy White wrote:
Hi Paul,
Something we also have with the current tests is that the source files actually point to the correct version in CVS. I now see some strange links to refs on http://test.winehq.org/data/20080205/.
Well, I'm afraid I'd argue that the current tests should be updated to point to git...
And, putting my money where my mouth is, I've ostensibly fixed that now. The code supposedly can handle either git or cvs style revisions now (although detection is crude; if rev has a period, it's cvs :-/).
Cheers,
Jeremy