Rein Klazes wrote:
test case for bug #18102
dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c index 4f602c2..5cf3fcd 100644 --- a/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c +++ b/dlls/user32/tests/scroll.c @@ -220,6 +220,130 @@ static void scrollbar_test_track(void) ok( IsWindow( hScroll), "Scrollbar has gone!\n"); }
+/* some tests designed to show that Horizontal and Vertical
- window scroll bar info are not created independently */
+static void scrollbar_test_default( DWORD style) +{
- INT min, max, ret;
- HWND hwnd;
- SCROLLINFO si = { sizeof( SCROLLINFO), SIF_TRACKPOS };
- hwnd = CreateWindowExA( 0, "static", "", WS_POPUP | style,
0, 0, 10, 10, 0, 0, 0, NULL);- assert( hwnd != 0);
- ret = GetScrollRange( hwnd, SB_VERT, &min, &max);
- ok( ret ||
broken( !ret) /* Win 98/ME */, "GetScrollRange failed.\n");
No comments on the patch as I don't know enough of this stuff. The comma at the start of a new line looks strange though (couple of these in the patch).
- scrollbar_test_default( 0);
+if( 0) { /* enable this when the todo's in scrollbar_test_default are fixed */
- scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL);
- scrollbar_test_default( WS_VSCROLL);
- scrollbar_test_default( WS_HSCROLL | WS_VSCROLL);
+}
Does Wine crash on these?