Re: wrc: change -J to -I-

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On 26 Feb 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Yes, that's the way to do it, except it has to be implemented, not
> stubbed out. The idea is that port.[ch] provides an emulation of the
> missing functions so that people writing the code don't need to worry
> about whether they exist or not. But if the replacement is broken then
> we very much want the caller to be aware of that; which is why I put
> the #ifdefs in wrc so that it's explicit that long options don't work
> if configure didn't find getopt_long().

Of course, I just sent that patch in to see if that was the direction
you wanted to go in. I was expecting, 'yeah, but implement that as well' :)

Not a problem, now I know what you want, I'll try to find some time
to do it.