Hi Zebediah,
Could you please also change the implementation in except_i386.c (there's identical call_copy_ctor function there).
Thanks, Piotr
On 06/01/18 00:13, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Signed-off-by: Zebediah Figura zfigura@codeweavers.com
dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c b/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c index 3402d13..ea5dffe 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/cpp.c @@ -1820,17 +1820,25 @@ void __cdecl __ExceptionPtrRethrow(const exception_ptr *ep) #if _MSVCR_VER >= 100
#ifdef __i386__ -static inline void call_copy_ctor( void *func, void *this, void *src, int has_vbase ) -{
- TRACE( "calling copy ctor %p object %p src %p\n", func, this, src );
- if (has_vbase)
/* in that case copy ctor takes an extra bool indicating whether to copy the base class */__asm__ __volatile__("pushl $1; pushl %2; call *%0": : "m" (func), "c" (this), "m" (src) : "eax", "edx", "memory" );- else
__asm__ __volatile__("pushl %2; call *%0": : "m" (func), "c" (this), "m" (src) : "eax", "edx", "memory" );-} +extern void call_copy_ctor( void *func, void *this, void *src, int has_vbase );
+__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( call_copy_ctor,
"pushl %ebp\n\t"__ASM_CFI(".cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 4\n\t")__ASM_CFI(".cfi_rel_offset %ebp,0\n\t")"movl %esp, %ebp\n\t"__ASM_CFI(".cfi_def_cfa_register %ebp\n\t")"cmpl $0, 20(%ebp)\n\t""jz 1f\n\t""pushl $1\n\t""1:\n\t""movl 12(%ebp), %ecx\n\t""pushl 16(%ebp)\n\t""call *8(%ebp)\n\t""leave\n"__ASM_CFI(".cfi_def_cfa %esp,4\n\t")__ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value %ebp\n\t") #else static inline void call_copy_ctor( void *func, void *this, void *src, int has_vbase ) {"ret" );