Why in the world would you implement Win98 behavior over WinXP, especially since the WinXP behavior is more logical and (probably, haven't looked) stated on msdn?
I did not implement Win98 behavior - it was already implemented that way in Wine, except for one difference that was found and changed to be consistent. Having said that, I agree that it is better to implement the WinXP behavior. I will do that in a future patch.
Reece Dunn escribió:
2008/6/30 James Hawkins truiken@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Alex Villacís Lasso a_villacis@palosanto.com wrote:
...
ok(si.nMin == 0xdeadbeef, "si.nMin == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n", si.nMin);
ok(si.nMax == 0xdeadbeef, "si.nMax == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n", si.nMax);
ok(si.nPos == 0xdeadbeef, "si.nPos == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n", si.nPos);
ok(si.nPage == 0xdeadbeef, "si.nPage == 0x%x, expected
0xdeadbeef\n", si.nPage);
if (r == ERROR_NO_SCROLLBARS) behavior_winxp = TRUE;
if (r == 0xdeadbeef) behavior_win98 = TRUE;
- } else {
if (r2) {
ok(si.nMin == 0, "si.nMin == %d, expected 0\n", si.nMin);
ok(si.nMax == 100, "si.nMax == %d, expected 100\n", si.nMax);
ok(si.nPos == 0, "si.nPos == %d, expected 0\n", si.nPos);
ok(si.nPage == 0, "si.nPage == %d, expected 0\n", si.nPage);
behavior_winxp = TRUE;
} else {
ok(r == 0xdeadbeef, "GetScrollInfo failed, error is %ld
(0x%08lx) expected 0xdeadbeef\n", r, r);
behavior_win98 = TRUE;
}
- }
This is seriously complex (in a bad way). I think you've tried to factor too much into one function. You don't need to set and check the version, just test for both cases that are expected, like all the other tests:
ok(si.nMin == 0 || si.nMin == 0xdeadbeef, "si.nMin == 0x%x, expected 0 or 0xdeadbeef\n", si.nMin);
Francois Gouget also implemented a broken() method so you can get Wine to do the right thing, something like:
ok(si.nMin == 0 /* XP */ || broken(si.nMin == 0xdeadbeef) /* 98 */ , "si.nMin == 0x%x, expected 0 or 0xdeadbeef\n", si.nMin);
- Reece
Thanks for the reminder. I will use it.