Re: [5/6] secur32: Implement schannel EncryptMessage().

[Henri Verbeet]

2008/12/29 Rob Shearman :
> 2008/12/28 Henri Verbeet :
> > - while (received < data_size)
> > - {
> > -
> >    ret = pgnutls_record_recv(ctx->session, data + received, data_size - received);
> > -
> >    if (ret < 0)
> > -
> >    {
> > -
> >        if (ret == GNUTLS_E_AGAIN)
> > -
> >        {
> > -
> >            if (!received)
>
> Shouldn't this be "if (received == data_size)"?
> > -
> >            {
> > -
> >                pgnutls_perror(ret);
> > -
> >                HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, data);
> > -
> >                TRACE("Returning SEC_E_INCOMPLETE_MESSAGE\n");
> > -
> >                return SEC_E_INCOMPLETE_MESSAGE;
> > -
> >            }
> > -
> >            break;
> > -
> >        }
> > -
> >        else
> > -
> >        {
> > -
> >            pgnutls_perror(ret);
> > -
> >            HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, data);
> > -
> >            ERR("Returning SEC_E_INTERNAL_ERROR\n");
> > -
> >            return SEC_E_INTERNAL_ERROR;
> > -
> >        }
> > -
> >    }
> > -
> >    received += ret;
> > - }

The idea was to only return SEC_E_INCOMPLETE_MESSAGE if there's less
than one complete TLS record in the buffer, it shouldn't be a problem
to have eg. one complete message plus some bytes from the next one,
setting the buffer size further down is supposed to take care of that.