"Erich E. Hoover" erich.e.hoover@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
"Erich E. Hoover" erich.e.hoover@gmail.com writes:
... Depending on the size of the functions, copying them into the server may be preferable. In any case it would be a good idea to submit the rest of the patches so we can see where this is going.
For the rest of the DOS Attributes features there's only a couple more relevant patches ( https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/ntdll-DOS... ): Mac OS X) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/master/patches... FreeBSD) https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/master/patches...
For the security descriptor patches we have a couple separate patchsets toward the full implementation (8 more patches): Bug #33576) storage/retrieval of SDs/ACLs (6 patches): https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/server-St... Bug #34406) inheritance of SDs/ACLs (2 patches): https://github.com/wine-compholio/wine-staging/tree/master/patches/server-In...
If you prefer i can submit them to wine-patches, but i figured that people probably don't want the spam.
Submitting them would be better, reading patches in a browser isn't very convenient. But from a quick look it seems that many parts will need more work, so I don't think you should be defining libport functions at this point.