Re: [PATCH] kernel32: add condition variables prototypes and tests (2nd try)

[Francois Gouget]

On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, Vincent Povirk wrote:
> > > Probably this should be a win_slip().
> >
> > The function exists only since Windows 7/Vista (not XP) and is not yet
> > in Wine (and might take a while, as my time is limited currently
> > and my knowledge of this specific function same).
> >
> > So I think "skip" is currently the right thing ;)
>
> I think a "todo_wine win_skip" is appropriate for cases where Wine
> should have an implementation but doesn't yet.

Absolutely. With a plain 'skip' we won't know that we have to change the 
test when the implementation is added to Wine whereas the 'todo 
win_skip' will make that clear.