Re: Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'

[James Mckenzie]

Juan Lang  on Aug 9, 2008 8:27 PM (PNT) wrote additionally in reply to Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'
> > Thank you for the clarification.  Thus, I can run the pre-built executable on WindowsXP and there should be no richedit errors, correct?
>
> That's the theory :)  The test don't run without error on my XP system, so YMMV.

Then I should end up with errors on my WindowsXP system that match yours.  I don't have time tonight to do so, but my find time tomorrow to run them.

James McKenzie

Question: Why are EM_FORMATRANGE Tests 'To Do'

[Juan Lang]

> Then I should end up with errors on my WindowsXP system that match yours.  I don't have time tonight to do so, but my find time tomorrow to run them.

Oops, I realized I should have been more clear.  I mean the tests in
general fail on my XP system.  I just ran the riched20 tests, though,
so you can compare:

editor.c:367: Test failed: 120 != 121
editor.c:1272:EM_STREAMOUT produced:
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0
System;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\b\f0\fs19 TestSomeText\par
}

editor.c:1528:EM_STREAMOUT produced:
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0
System;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\b\f0\fs19 TestSomeText\par
}

editor.c:2813:EM_SETTEXTEX is supported on this platform
editor.c:2088:Testing EM_REPLACESEL behavior with redraw=1
editor.c:2088:Testing EM_REPLACESEL behavior with redraw=0
editor: 825 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 1 failure), 0 skipped.

--Juan