Making SetThreadPriorityBoost claim success

[Dan Kegel]

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup.

How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just
return success, as in the patch attached to

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1

http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=p...

?  We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE.

Related if catty discussion:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html

[Daniel Jeliński]

I guess the only way to find out is sending a patch to wine-patches. It
would probably be acceptable, SetThreadStackGuarantee also returns true
while doing nothing.
By the way, this page might be more related to the function in question:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4985566
(search for 'boost')

Regards,
Daniel

2013/5/26 Dan Kegel
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup.
>
> How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just
> return success, as in the patch attached to
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1
>
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=p...
>
> ?  We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE.
>
> Related if catty discussion:
> http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html