Any concerns? I've gone over this patch, and I don't see anything major.
If it will make you feel any better, I just ran the tests under a WoW64 environment on Linux, and they passed.
Chip
On 10/25/2010 03:03 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Any concerns? I've gone over this patch, and I don't see anything major.
If it will make you feel any better, I just ran the tests under a WoW64 environment on Linux, and they passed.
Chip
Will your patch detect a Wine folder on ciopfs and work well in it? I admit this isn't a common use case (yet), but I intend to change this.
-Scott Ritchie
On 10/27/10 8:54 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
On 10/25/2010 03:03 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
Any concerns? I've gone over this patch, and I don't see anything major.
If it will make you feel any better, I just ran the tests under a WoW64 environment on Linux, and they passed.
Chip
Will your patch detect a Wine folder on ciopfs and work well in it? I admit this isn't a common use case (yet), but I intend to change this.
Yep. I incorporated your idea (testing for a hidden .ciopfs file in the directory), and I made sure I tested the patch on a ciopfs.
I created the hidden file manually; we still have to make the FS driver create the file automatically.
Chip