Hi, Is there any thing wrong with this patch?
Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes
"Alistair Leslie-Hughes" leslie_alistair@hotmail.com wrote in message news:fpljui$nsa$1@ger.gmane.org...
Hi, Correct msvcrt.spec file
Changelog: msvcrt: Implemented wcscpy_s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From 6860771cc3fc06b3da63f7c674daf71861593ef3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:48:01 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Implemented wcscpy_s
dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec | 1 + dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec b/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec index d6cffcb..7b821e6 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/msvcrt.spec @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ @ cdecl wcscmp(wstr wstr) ntdll.wcscmp @ cdecl wcscoll(wstr wstr) MSVCRT_wcscoll @ cdecl wcscpy(ptr wstr) ntdll.wcscpy +@ cdecl wcscpy_s(ptr long wstr) MSVCRT_wcscpy_s @ cdecl wcscspn(wstr wstr) ntdll.wcscspn @ cdecl wcsftime(ptr long wstr ptr) MSVCRT_wcsftime @ cdecl wcslen(wstr) ntdll.wcslen diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c index c6dcd34..b09d204 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static int* (*pmemcmp)(void *, const void *, size_t n); static int (*pstrcpy_s)(char *dst, size_t len, const char *src); static int (*pstrcat_s)(char *dst, size_t len, const char *src); static int (*p_mbsnbcpy_s)(unsigned char * dst, size_t size, const unsigned char * src, size_t count); +static int (*p_wcscpy_s)(wchar_t *wcDest, size_t size, const wchar_t *wcSrc);
#define SETNOFAIL(x,y) x = (void*)GetProcAddress(hMsvcrt,y) #define SET(x,y) SETNOFAIL(x,y); ok(x != NULL, "Export '%s' not found\n", y) @@ -562,6 +563,47 @@ static void test__mbsnbcpy_s(void) dest[0], dest[1], dest[2], dest[3], dest[4], dest[5], dest[6], dest[7]); }
+static void test_wcscpy_s(void) +{
- static const WCHAR szLongText[] = {
'T','h','i','s','A','L','o','n','g','s','t','r','i','n','g',0 };
- static WCHAR szDest[18];
- static WCHAR szDestShort[8];
- int ret;
- if(!p_wcscpy_s)
- {
skip("wcscpy_s not found\n");
return;
- }
- /* Test NULL Dest */
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(NULL, 16, szLongText);
- ok(ret == EINVAL, "p_wcscpy_s expect EINVAL got %d\n", ret);
- /* Test NULL Source */
- szDest[0] = 'A';
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 16, NULL);
- ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret);
- ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
- /* Test invalid size */
- szDest[0] = 'A';
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 0, szLongText);
- ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected ERANGE got %d\n", ret);
- ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
- /* Copy same buffer size */
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 18, szLongText);
- ok(ret == 0, "expected 0 got %d\n", ret);
- ok(lstrcmpW(szDest, szLongText) == 0, "szDest != szLongText\n");
- /* Copy smaller buffer size */
- szDest[0] = 'A';
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDestShort, 8, szLongText);
- ok(ret == ERANGE, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret);
- ok(szDestShort[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
+}
START_TEST(string) { char mem[100]; @@ -577,6 +619,7 @@ START_TEST(string) SET(pstrcpy_s,"strcpy_s"); SET(pstrcat_s,"strcat_s"); SET(p_mbsnbcpy_s,"_mbsnbcpy_s");
SET(p_wcscpy_s,"wcscpy_s");
/* MSVCRT memcpy behaves like memmove for overlapping moves, MFC42 CString::Insert seems to rely on that behaviour */
@@ -599,4 +642,6 @@ START_TEST(string) test_strcpy_s(); test_strcat_s(); test__mbsnbcpy_s();
- test_wcscpy_s();
} diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c b/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c index 92dd644..66b8907 100644 --- a/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/wcs.c @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ #include "wine/unicode.h" #include "wine/debug.h"
+#include <msvcrt/errno.h>
WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(msvcrt);
@@ -971,3 +973,46 @@ INT CDECL MSVCRT_iswxdigit( MSVCRT_wchar_t wc ) { return isxdigitW( wc ); }
+/*********************************************************************
- wcscpy_s (MSVCRT.@)
- */
+INT CDECL MSVCRT_wcscpy_s( MSVCRT_wchar_t* wcDest, size_t numElement, const MSVCRT_wchar_t *wcSrc) +{
- int size = 0;
- if(!wcDest)
return EINVAL;
- if(!wcSrc)
- {
wcDest[0] = 0;
return EINVAL;
- }
- if(numElement <= 0)
- {
wcDest[0] = 0;
if(numElement < 0)
return ERANGE;
else
return EINVAL;
- }
- size = strlenW(wcSrc) + 1;
- if(size > numElement)
- {
wcDest[0] = 0;
return ERANGE;
- }
- if(size > numElement)
size = numElement;
- memcpy( wcDest, wcSrc, size*sizeof(WCHAR) );
- return 0;
+}
-- 1.5.4.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Alistair Leslie-Hughes" leslie_alistair@hotmail.com writes:
Is there any thing wrong with this patch?
- /* Test invalid size */
- szDest[0] = 'A';
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 0, szLongText);
- ok(ret == EINVAL, "expected ERANGE got %d\n", ret);
- ok(szDest[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
- /* Copy same buffer size */
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDest, 18, szLongText);
- ok(ret == 0, "expected 0 got %d\n", ret);
- ok(lstrcmpW(szDest, szLongText) == 0, "szDest != szLongText\n");
- /* Copy smaller buffer size */
- szDest[0] = 'A';
- ret = p_wcscpy_s(szDestShort, 8, szLongText);
- ok(ret == ERANGE, "expected EINVAL got %d\n", ret);
- ok(szDestShort[0] == 0, "szDest[0] not 0\n");
The error messages don't match the tests.
- if(numElement <= 0)
- {
wcDest[0] = 0;
if(numElement < 0)
return ERANGE;
else
return EINVAL;
The variable is unsigned so the comparison is useless. Also its type should be MSVCRT_size_t.