Siim Karus wrote:
@@ -962,6 +1037,33 @@ DATETIME_IncreaseField (infoPtr, fieldNum, INT_MAX); DATETIME_SendDateTimeChangeNotify (infoPtr); break;
case VK_NUMPAD0:case VK_NUMPAD1:case VK_NUMPAD2:case VK_NUMPAD3:case VK_NUMPAD4:case VK_NUMPAD5:case VK_NUMPAD6:case VK_NUMPAD7:case VK_NUMPAD8:case VK_NUMPAD9:DATETIME_EditField (infoPtr, fieldNum, vkCode-VK_NUMPAD0);DATETIME_SendDateTimeChangeNotify (infoPtr);break;case (WORD)'0':case (WORD)'1':case (WORD)'2':case (WORD)'3':case (WORD)'4':case (WORD)'5':case (WORD)'6':case (WORD)'7':case (WORD)'8':case (WORD)'9':DATETIME_EditField (infoPtr, fieldNum, vkCode-(WORD)('0'));DATETIME_SendDateTimeChangeNotify (infoPtr);break;- case VK_LEFT: do { if (infoPtr->select == 0) {
I think this would be better done in the processing for the WM_CHAR message instead. Then you wouldn't have the mess of having to handle the numpad keys as well.