Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] MR9260: winemac: Make macdrv_ime_process_key synchronous.

[Marc-Aurel Zent (＠mzent)]

On Mon Nov  3 08:07:50 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> I don't think it's good to call `macdrv_ProcessEvents` directly. Why is
> it still necessary if the key processing is synchronous?

With the current design we need to handle `IM_SET_TEXT` (which is generated by the key processing itself) before `macdrv_ImeProcessKey()` returns, otherwise the issue @bsjeon described above happens.

Of course this is still not completely race-free (but the previous version also wasn't), since the thread running `- (void) completeText:(NSString*)text` and generating this event can be preempted at any time.