17 Sep
2025
17 Sep
'25
9:25 a.m.
On Wed Sep 17 09:21:55 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
I removed the extra check, it'll need to be added back if that function is used for more limits.
Actually I found it surprising that we didn't have it already, and we should be needing the RLIMIT_NICE too as it'll change how wineserver can use setpriority.
I think the reason I had to do that is for when wineserver is started separately from a wine processes, rlimit changes are inherited from parent processes right?