http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4619
blin(a)gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From blin(a)gmx.net 2006-08-12 02:48 -------
Fixed with commit 24b64534e592e47e5cac70e497a98c0ddbc3941b.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
blin(a)gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From blin(a)gmx.net 2006-08-12 02:46 -------
Fixed with commit 24b64534e592e47e5cac70e497a98c0ddbc3941b.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6846
t.artem(a)mailcity.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |download
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6846
Summary: All WinAMP windows are shown incorrectly
Product: Wine
Version: CVS
Platform: All
URL: http://download.nullsoft.com/winamp/client/winamp532_ful
l.exe
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: wine-x11driver
AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org
ReportedBy: t.artem(a)mailcity.com
Equalizer and Playlist windows should not have WM decorations, winamp main
window is not shown correctly, some strange unknown window is shown.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5123
t.artem(a)mailcity.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From t.artem(a)mailcity.com 2006-08-12 02:03 -------
With the current Wine version this bug is no longer valid. Closing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5802
------- Additional Comments From dank(a)kegel.com 2006-07-12 23:03 -------
Is this a dup of bug 4971? James said there
that MSI custom action 6 means the installer
tried to execute a vbscript action (!).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6835
tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |NoAppDBEntry
------- Additional Comments From tony.lambregts(a)gmail.com 2006-07-12 22:31 -------
I could not find an entry for this application in the AppDB. Could you please
add entry for this program. http://appdb.winehq.org
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6836
------- Additional Comments From mail(a)science.su 2006-07-12 21:22 -------
> It doesn't have to look the same, but cutting off szOtherStuff is not
> acceptable. I also think it should attempt to provide copyright information
> from the program resources.
I agree that is cutting off szOtherStuff is bad and should be fixed but I think
that displaying "Wine was bought to you by ..." list is nice idea. In fact it
definitely doesn't say that depelopers of Wine created *this* application - it
just say who developed Wine. Also please note that Wine's notepad and others
Wine's standard programs also uses this about box. And I agree with Mike - it
is good practice to create patches and then discuss them for such minor bugs
if you really care about this. Of course I do not say that someone who created
bug report *must* create patches to get bug fixed - this way simply faster for
such trivial bugs.
> In at least one case (original
> Notepad), there is no indication of the original copyright/authorship at all,
> and a careless read makes it seem like Wine wrote it!
If you managed to run original Notepad then you must know that it belongs to
Windows. But in fact it is more Notepad's bug that it doesn't contain copyright
information (real (not neccessary official) copyright owner is programmer(s)
who wrote it and not Microsoft; in this case Microsoft is official copyright
owner). Theoretically it is possible to determine that that this is Microsoft
Notepad and display this within about box but someone must write patch for
this. It would be nice of course and I agree that it is good if someone
implement this but such implementation should be careful - it shouldn't display
Microsoft's copyright within Wine's Notepad!
I think that only "real" bug is problem with szOtherStuff. Other problems
discussed here isn't actually bugs - I think it is more correct to call them
design solutions. What design is better is just someone's opinion and virtually
all opinions that make any sense is "right" but only one can be actually used.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6842
------- Additional Comments From wine.severach(a)spamgourmet.com 2006-07-12 21:06 -------
>choose one method
The preprocessor lines aren't there for the computer, it's there for the
implementor of this patch. If they decide to do the extra work of caching, the
lines are shown that do the work. If not they drop the extra cache lines and
implement the simpler non caching method. The implementor may also choose to do
the work with internal GUI primitives to improve speed.
>Don't use C++-style comments
The comments are for the implementor of the patch not for the final Wine code.
They are to answer the questions that the implementor will have "Why didn't you
do it some other way?" Answer: I tried those other ways and found them to be
slower or less compatible.
>It would be easier to check your code if you sent it as a patch to wine-devel
I can't send it as a patch because I don't run Wine. It would be inappropriate
for me to submit code that I haven't tested under the target OS. This was all
developed in Windows where I have the real DrawFocusRect to compare behavior.
>We want to be able to see exactly what you've changed
That's easy. All the old code was thrown away and the new code is printed above.
The old code is sufficient only as a stop gap solution until someone takes the
time to produce the new code.
>How do you know it's more correct than our current implementation?
In Windows I have the real DrawFocusRect that I can draw on whatever test colors
I can dream up. I hack until my DrawFocusRect always produces the same result. A
quick read of the comments in Wine DrawFocusRect acknowledges that the current
way is wrong and PatBlt is the right way. I'm providing working PatBlt code.
>How do you know that it's faster?
The Windows project I built to produce the code has the necessary timing code to
demonstrate performance in Windows. Wine performance is likely to be similar.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.